Analyzing Learning Obstacle with Didactical Design Research on Three Dimensional Distance Material
Abstract
he purpose of this study was to analyze the barriers to learning three-dimensional distance material using Didactical Design Research (DDR). The subjects of this study were two groups of class 12. The instruments used in this study were pretest (initial test) and post test (final test) which consisted of a test of the respondent’s ability, interview sheets, and observation notes. The data obtained were analyzed using three DDR steps: (1) didactic situation analysis by recontextualizing, repersonalizing, and developing didactic designs which include PDA (Pedagogical Didactic Anticipation); (2) metapedadidactic analysis by applying PDA; and (3) retrospective analysis linking didactic and metapedadidactic situations. The results showed that the identified learning obstacles can be anticipated by using PDA. The application of the didactic learning design shows that this design can be an alternative to third-dimensional distance learning in grade 12 because it can minimize student learning barriers that have been identified previously.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
D. Suryadi, “Menciptakan Proses Belajar Aktif: Kajian dari Sudut Pandang Teori Belajar dan Teori Didaktik - Modul Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika UNP Padang.” UPI, Bandung, 2010.
J. Khatimah, Husnul; Kamid; Marzal, “The Development of Student Worksheets Based on APOS Theory (Action, Processe, Object, Scheme) to Elevate the Effectivity in Learning Mathematics,” J. Pendidik. Mat. dan Ilmu Pengetah. Alam, vol. 4, no. 2, 2015.
G. Brousseau and V. Warfield, “Didactic situations in mathematics education,” Encycl. Math. Educ., 2020, [Online]. Available: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-030-15789-0_47.pdf.
M. L. Bishop, J. P., Lamb, L. L., Philipp, R. A., Whitacre, I., Schappelle, B. P., & Lewis, “Obstacles and Affordances for Integer Reasoning: An Analysis of Children’s Thinking and the History of Mathematics,” J. Res. Math. Educ., vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 19–61, 2014, doi: 128.248.155.225.
N. Hercovics, “The Description and Analysis of Mathematical Processes.” Center for Mathematics, Science, and Computer Education Rutgers, New Jersey, 1989.
M. Noto, “Analysis of learning obstacles on transformation geometry,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 1157, no. 4. 2019, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1157/4/042100.
A. Cesaria, “Learning obstacle in geometry,” J. Eng. Sci. Technol., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 1271–1280, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85072018545&origin=inward.
T. Adolphus, “Problem of Teaching and Learning of Geometry in Secondary School in Rivers State, Nigeria,” Int. J. Emerg. Sci, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 143–152, 2011.
E. Sumiaty, “Didactical design work sheet of complex variable function based on epistemology, didactical, and learning trajectory to enhance student’s ability for representation and communication,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 1280, no. 4. 2019, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1280/4/042033.
D. Suryadi, “Didactical Design Research (DDR) Dalam Pengembangan Pembelajaran Matematika1 - Modul Seminar Nasional FPMIPA UPI.” UPI, Bandung, 2016.
R. A. Fitriani, Nelly., Gida Kadarisma, “Pengembangan Desain Didaktis Untuk Mengatasi Learning Obstacle Pada Materi Dimensi Tiga,” J. Progr. Stud. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 231–241, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v9i2.2686.
M. Artigue, “Didactic engineering in mathematics education,” Encycl. Math. Educ., 2020, [Online]. Available: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-030-15789-0_44.pdf.
M. . Simon, “Reconstructing Mathematics Pedagogy from a Contructivist Perspective,” J. Res. Math. Educ., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 114–145, 1995.
J. C. Wilson, P. Holt., Gemma F.M., “Learning Trajectories in Teacher Education: Supporting Teachers’ Understandings of Students’ Mathematical Thinking,” J. Math. Behav., vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 103–121, 2013.
M. R. W. Godino, Juan, D., Rivas H., “Analysis of Didactical Trajectories in Teaching and Learning Mathematics: Overcoming Extreme Objectivist and Constructivist Positions,” Int. Electron. J. Math. Educ., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 147–161, 2019.
Sumiatik, “Desain Didaktis Sistem Persamaan Linear Tiga Variabel Di Kelas X MA Al-Mustaqim,” Pontianak: Universitas Tanjungpura, 2019.
D. Mulyana, E., Turmudi & Juandi, “Model pengembangan Desain Didaktis Subject Specific PedagogyBidang Matematika Melalui Program Pendidikan Profesi Guru,” J. Pengajaran MIPA, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 141–149.
S. Bikner-Ahsbahs, A. & Prediger, Networking of Theories as a Research Practice in Mathematics Education. Springer, 2014.
A. V Erten, S., Şen, C. & Yűzűak, “A Critical Analysis to 5thGrade Elementary Science EducationTextbook.,” Int. J. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Educ., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2015.
M. A. H. T. D. J. A. Jatmiko, “Desain Didaktis Materi Kaidah Pencacahan Untuk Siswa SMA Kelas XI,” J. Res. Math. Educ., vol. 4, no. 35–54, 2021.
A. A. Haqq, “Pengembangan Desain Didaktis Geometri Berbantuan Perangkat Lunak Cabri 3D pada Pembelajaran Matematika SMA,” Theorems (The Orig. Res. Math., vol. 5, no. 1, 2020.
R. E. Orrill, C.H.& Brown, “NumberLines in Profesional Development: Exploring Teachers’ Understandings of Proportional Relationships,” J. Math. Teach. Educ., no. 15, pp. 381–403, 2012.
K. Ekawati, R., Lin, F. & Yang, “Developing an Instrument for Measuring Teachers’ Mathematics Content Knowledge on Ratio and Proportion: A Case of Indonesian Primary Teachers,” Int. J. Sci. Math. Educ., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–24, 2014.
A. Wijaya, “The Relationships Between Indonesian Fourth Graders’ Difficulties in Fractions and The Opportunity to Learn Fractions: A Snapshot of TIMSS Results,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 221–236, 2017.
K. Kumar,R. S. & Subramaniam, “From ‘Following’ to ‘Going Beyond’ The Textbook: In-Service Indian mathematics Teachers’ Professional Development for Teaching Integers,” Aust. J. Teach. Educ., vol. 40, no. 12, pp. 86–103, 2015.
S. Arslan, Selahattin; Baran, Demet; Oku, us, “Brousseau’s Theory of Didactical Situations in Mathematics and An Application of Adidactical Situations,” Necatibey Fac. Educ. Electron. J. Sci. Math. Educ., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 204–224, 2011.
D. Setiadi, “Didactical Design Enrichment of Angle in Geometry,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 895, no. 1. 2017, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/895/1/012060.
S. Sulistiawati; Suryadi, Didi; Fatimah, “Desain Didaktis Penalaran Matematis untuk Mengatasi Kesulitan Belajar Siswa SMP pada Luas dan Volume Limas,” J. Mat. Kreat., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 135–146, 2015.
A. Pratamawati, “Desain Didaktis untuk Mengatasi Learning Obstacle Siswa Sekolah Menengah Atas pada Materi Fungsi Invers,” J. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 15–28, 2020.
A. A. . Sakinah, E., Darwan., “Desain Didaktis Materi Trigonometri dalam Upaya Meminimalisir Hambatan Belajar Siswa,” Suska J. Math. Educ., vol. 5, no. 121–130, 2019.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24042/ijsme.v4i3.10355
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Unit Riset dan Publikasi Ilmiah FTK UIN Raden Intan Lampung
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.