Web-Based Inquiry in Science Learning: Bibliometric Analysis


Pramita Sylvia Dewi, Ari Widodo, Diana Rochintaniawati, Eka Cahya Prima


Web-based inquiry is an intermediary medium that supports broad sharing of data and ideas, in visualizing, analyzing, and offering knowledge integration. This study aims to analyze the scope of scientific research related to web-based inquiry using bibliometric studies starting from the last 10 years. Database information is obtained from Scopus indexed papers, via the Publish or Perish application. Based on the search and selection results, 65 articles were obtained which were then reviewed with Zotero and processed with the VOS viewer. The analysis used is based on the title area, according to web-based inquiry in supporting science education research. Overall, this study provides information regarding research opportunities in science learning with web-based inquiry, especially during this pandemic. This research also illustrates the publication opportunities in various countries that have a high interest in the topic of inquiry. The mapping of the bibliometric results also supports the scientific explanation between the theory and the evidence of probability. Therefore, the literature is expected to be a reference for further science research.


bibliometric analysis, science education, web-based inquiry

Full Text:



S. M. Sanahuja, “Teaching innovation projects: fundamental features to their design, implementation and evaluation,” Rev. Ciencias Pedagógicas e Innovación, vol. VII, no. 1, pp. 95–103, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2935-1202.

S. Supermane, “Transformational leadership and innovation in teaching and learning activities: The mediation e ect of knowledge management.,” Inf. Discov. Deliv, vol. 47, pp. 242–250, 2019.

S. Kars-Unluoglu, “How do we educate future innovation managers? Insights on innovation education in MBA syllabi,” Innov. Manag. Policy Pract., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 74–98, 2016, doi: 10.1080/14479338.2016.1187077.

P. A. Ho, C. Girgis, J. K. Rustad, D. Noordsy, and T. A. Stern, “Advancing the Mission of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry Through Innovation in Teaching,” Psychosomatics, vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 539–548, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.psym.2019.07.007.

N. A. Soltis, K. S. McNeal, C. T. Forbes, and D. Lally, “The relationship between active learning, course innovation, and teaching Earth systems thinking: A structural equation modeling approach,” Geosphere, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 1703–1721, 2019, doi: 10.1130/GES02071.1.

G. Li and F. Wang, “Research on art innovation teaching platform based on data mining algorithm,” Cluster Comput., vol. 22, pp. 13867–13872, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s10586-018-2119-x.

N. Van Assche et al., “Guidelines for development of Implant Dentistry in the next 10 years regarding innovation, education, certification, and associations,” Clin. Oral Implants Res., vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 568–575, 2018, doi: 10.1111/clr.13154.

C. M. Chou, C. H. Shen, H. C. Hsiao, and T. C. Shen, “Factors influencing teachers’ innovative teaching behaviour with information and communication technology (ICT): the mediator role of organisational innovation climate,” Educ. Psychol., vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 65–85, 2019, doi: 10.1080/01443410.2018.1520201.

M. N. Campos Soto, M. Ramos Navas-Parejo, and A. J. Moreno Guerrero, “Virtual reality and motivation in the educational context: Bibliometric study of the last twenty years from Scopus,” Alteridad-Revista Educ., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 47–60, 2020, doi: 10.17163/alt.v15n1.2020.04.

P. S. Dewi, D. Rochintaniawati, and S. Parsaoran, “Profiling the context of natural history teacher candidate for the elementary school degree through web-based inquiry,” J. Inov. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 49–58, 2020, doi: 10.21831/jipi.v6i1.30991.

A. M. Bodzin and W. M. Cates, “Enhancing Preservice Teachers’ Understanding of Web-based Scientific Inquiry,” J. Sci. Teacher Educ., vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 237–257, 2003, doi: 10.1023/b:jste.0000009549.20273.8a.

M. C. Linn, P. Bell, and S. Hsi, “Lifelong science learning on the Internet: The knowledge integration environment.,” Interact. Learn. Environ., vol. 6(1–2), pp. 4–38, 1998.

A. Feldman, C. Konold, and B. Coulter, Network science, a decade later: The Internet and classroom learning., Mahwah, NJ. 2000.

D. C. Edelson, D. N. Gordin, and R. D. Pea, “Addressing the challenges of inquiry-based learning through technology and curriculum design.,” J. Learn. Sci., vol. 8(3–4), pp. 391–450, 1999.

M. C. Linn and S. Hsi, “Computers. Teachers. Peers. Science Learning Partners.,” NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates., 2000.

A. M. Bodzin, “Implementing Web-Based Scientific Inquiry in Preservice Science Methods Courses,” Contemp. Issues Technol. Teach. Educ. (CITE Journal), vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 50–65, 2005, [Online]. Available: https://acces.bibl.ulaval.ca/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ1080843〈=fr&site=ehost-live%0Ahttp://www.citejournal.org/vol5/iss1/general/article1.cfm.

B. P. Woolf et al., “A general platform for inquiry learning,” Springer, vol. 2363, pp. 681–697, 2002, doi: 10.1007/3-540-47987-2_69.

L. Meng, F. Hua, and Z. Bian, “Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): Emerging and Future Challenges for Dental and Oral Medicine,” J. Dent. Res., vol. 99, no. 5, pp. 481–487, 2020, doi: 10.1177/0022034520914246.

A. Raes, T. Schellens, and B. De Wever, “Web-based Collaborative Inquiry to Bridge Gaps in Secondary Science Education,” J. Learn. Sci., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 316–347, 2014, doi: 10.1080/10508406.2013.836656.

D. Llewellyn, Inquiry within: Implementing inquiry-based science standards in Grades 3–8. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press., 2007.

W. W. Cobern et al., “Experimental comparison of inquiry and direct instruction in science,” Res. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 81–96, 2010, doi: 10.1080/02635140903513599.

D. Llewellyn, Inquiry within: Implementing inquiry- based science standards. USA: Corwinn Press, Inc., 2014.

G. Silm, K. Tiitsaar, M. Pedaste, Z. Zacharia, and M. Papaevripidou, “Teachers’ Readiness to Use Inquiry-Based Learning: An Investigation of Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy and Attitudes toward Inquiry-Based Learning.,” Sci. Educ. Int., vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 315–325, 2017.

R. D. Truya and J. Bellen, “Undergraduate Students ’ Experiences of Scientific Inquiry in a Web-Based Environment : A Descriptive Phenomenological Study,” no. January, 2020.

D. K. Capps and B. A. Crawford, “Inquiry-Based Instruction and Teaching About Nature of Science: Are They Happening?,” J. Sci. Teacher Educ., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 497–526, 2013, doi: 10.1007/s10972-012-9314-z.

G. E. Glasson, “The effects of hands‐on and teacher demonstration laboratory methods on science achievement in relation to reasoning ability and prior knowledge,” J. Res. Sci. Teach., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 121–131, 1989, doi: 10.1002/tea.3660260204.

S. Olson, S., & Loucks-Horsley, Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academy Press., 2000.

D. Cairns and S. Areepattamannil, “Exploring the Relations of Inquiry-Based Teaching to Science Achievement and Dispositions in 54 Countries,” Res. Sci. Educ., vol. 49, no. 1, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s11165-017-9639-x.

D. G. Brenner et al., “Modeling Student Learning Behavior Patterns in an Online Science Inquiry Environment,” Technol. Knowl. Learn., vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 405–425, 2017, doi: 10.1007/s10758-017-9325-0.

S. Becker, P. Klein, A. Gößling, and J. Kuhn, “Using mobile devices to enhance inquiry-based learning processes,” Learn. Instr., vol. 69, no. April, p. 101350, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101350.

Van Eck NJ and W. L, “VOS viewer.” Leiden: Univeristeit Leiden, p. pp.1-53., 2013.

M. Gutiérrez-Salcedo, M. Á. Martínez, J. A. Moral-Munoz, E. Herrera-Viedma, and M. J. Cobo, “Some bibliometric procedures for analyzing and evaluating research fields,” Appl. Intell., vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 1275–1287, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s10489-017-1105-y.

A. Kovács, B. Van Looy, and B. Cassiman, “Exploring the scope of open innovation: a bibliometric review of a decade of research,” Scientometrics, vol. 104, no. 3, pp. 951–983, 2015, doi: 10.1007/s11192-015-1628-0.

W. Glänzel, “The role of core documents in bibliometric network analysis and their relation with h-type indices,” Scientometrics, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 113–123, 2012, doi: 10.1007/s11192-012-0639-3.

W. Glänzel and B. Thijs, “Using ‘core documents’ for the representation of clusters and topics,” Scientometrics, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 297–309, 2011, doi: 10.1007/s11192-011-0347-4.

C. Michael Hall, “Publish and perish? Bibliometric analysis, journal ranking and the assessment of research quality in tourism,” Tour. Manag., vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 16–27, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2010.07.001.

J. C. Valderrama-Zurián, R. Aguilar-Moya, D. Melero-Fuentes, and R. Aleixandre-Benavent, “A systematic analysis of duplicate records in Scopus,” J. Informetr., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 570–576, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2015.05.002.

A. Baneyx, “‘Publish or Perish’ as citation metrics used to analyze scientific output in the humanities: International case studies in economics, geography, social sciences, philosophy, and history,” Arch. Immunol. Ther. Exp. (Warsz)., vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 363–371, 2008, doi: 10.1007/s00005-008-0043-0.

I. Setyaningsih and N. Indarti, “Bibliometric analysis of the term ‘ green manufacturing ’ Ira Setyaningsih * and Nurul Indarti Ferry Jie,” Int. J. Manag. Concepts Philos., vol. 11, no. 3, 2018.

N. J. van Eck and L. Waltman, “Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping,” Scientometrics, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 523–538, 2010, doi: 10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3.

D. Tranfield, D. Denyer, and P. Smart, “Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review*,” Br. J. Manag., vol. 14, pp. 207–222, 2003, doi: 10.1080/16258312.2014.11517339.

A. I. Yasin, D. Rochintaniawati, and E. C. Prima, “The development of web based inquiry as online science inquiry environment,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1806, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012141.

A. García-Carmona, “Pre-service Primary Science Teachers’ Abilities for Solving a Measurement Problem Through Inquiry,” Int. J. Sci. Math. Educ., vol. 17, no. 1, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s10763-017-9858-7.

L. Uiterwijk-Luijk, M. Krüger, B. Zijlstra, and M. Volman, “Teachers’ role in stimulating students’ inquiry habit of mind in primary schools,” Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 86, p. 102894, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2019.102894.

A. Widodo, “Peningkatan Kemampuan Mahasiswa PGSD dalam Mengajukan Pertanyaan Produktif untuk Mendukung Pembelajaran IPA Berbasis Inkuiri,” J. Pendidik., vol. 1, no. 10, pp. 21–29, 2009.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24042/ijsme.v4i2.9576

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 102 | PDF downloads : 34


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2021 Unit Riset dan Publikasi Ilmiah FTK UIN Raden Intan Lampung

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License

Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License