Building physics concept understanding and problem-solving ability in online learning through concept attainment model

https://doi.org/10.24042/jipfalbiruni.v11i1.11775

I Wayan Distrik, Wawan Setiawan, Chandra Ertikanto

Abstract


This research aimed to build physics concept understanding and to problem-solve in online learning through the concept attainment learning model. This research employed a quasi-experimental method with a non-equivalent control group pretest-posttest design. The population was natural sciences students in grade XI of Public Islamic School 1 in Pringsewu, Lampung, Indonesia. The samples consisted of 35 grade XI students from class IPA 3 for the experimental group and 34 grade XI students from class IPA 2 for the control group. The concept understanding test consisted of ten problems referring to Anderson and Krotwall’s indicators. The problem-solving test consisted of five problems referring to problems developed by Savage and William. The test results of physics concept understanding and problem-solving ability were analyzed descriptively by grouping the data, calculating the n-gain, and interpreting the data. The difference in physics concept understanding and problem-solving between experimental and control classes were analyzed using an independent sample t-test. The result showed that the n-gains of physics concept understanding and problem-solving ability were in the high and moderate categories, respectively, for the experimental class and the moderate and moderate categories, respectively, for the control class. The independent sample t-test showed that conceptual understanding and problem-solving ability differed significantly between the experiment and control classrooms. This result indicated that the concept attainment model in online learning was better for building physics concept understanding and problem-solving ability for senior high school students than other conventional learning models.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdullah, N., Halim, L., & Zakaria, E. (2014). Vstops: A thinking strategy and visual representation approach in mathematical word problem-solving toward enhancing STEM literacy. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science & Technology Education, 10(3), 165-174.

Adedoyin, O. B., & Soykan, E. (2020). Covid-19 pandemic and online learning: the challenges and opportunities. Interactive Learning Environments. 2020, 1-13 https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1813180

Agustina, L. (2016). Upaya peningkatan kemampuan pemahaman konsep dan pemecahan masalah matematika siswa SMP Negeri 4 Sipirok Kelas VII melalui pendekatan matematika realistik (PMR). Eksakta: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran MIPA, 1(1), 1-7.

Anderson, L., dan Krathwohl, D. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing. Longman.

Angraini, L. M., & Wahyuni, A. (2020). The effect of concept attainment model on mathematical critical thinking ability. International Journal of Instruction, 14(1), 727-742.

Anupan, A., & Chimmalee, B. (2022). A concept attainment model using cloud-based mobile learning to enhance the mathematical conceptual knowledge of undergraduate students. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 12(2), 171-178.

Demirci, N. (2006). Students conceptual knoledge about electrocity and magnetsm and its implications: An example of Turkish University. Science Education International, 17(1), 49-64.

Distrik, I W., Imam Supardi, Z. A., Jatmiko, B., & Yuberti. (2021). The effects of multiple representations-based learning in improving concept understanding and problem-solving ability. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1796(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1796/1/012044

Effendi, K, N, S. (2017). Pemahaman konsep siswa kelas VIII pada materi kubus dan balok. Pasundan Journal, 2(2), 87-94

Fraenkel, J.R. and Wallen, N.E. (2003). How to design and evalution research in education. 5th end. McGraw-Hill Companies.

Hake, R. (2002). Relationship of individual student normalized learning gain in mechanics with gender. Hight School Physics, and pretest Score on Mathematics and Special Visualization. Retrieved from: http://www.physics.indiana.edu/-hake.

Halim, A., Farada, S., Hamid, A., Mustafa, M., Nurulwati, N., Mahzum, E., & Irwandi, I. (2021). Effect of concept attainment model on student’s science process skills. Journal of Physics Conference Series, 1882(1), 1-6.

Handayani, R., & Hidayati,Y.M. (2020). Implementasi model pembelajaran model concept attainment untuk mengembangkan kemampuan pemecahan masalah. Profesi pendidikan dasar, 7(2), 171-183.

Hanum, N.S. (2013). Efektifitas e-learning sebagai media pembelajaran (studi evaluasi model pembelajaran e-learning SMK Telkom Sandhy Putra Purwokerto). Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 3(1), 90-102.

Ifrianti, S., Maharani, L., Istihana, I., Komikesari, H., Yusandika, A. D., & Jamilah, S. (2019). The influence of concept attainment models on students’ conceptual understanding. Journal of Physics Conference Series, 1155(2019), 012020.

Johnson, N., Veletsianos, G., & Seaman, J. (2020). U. S. faculty and administrators’ experiences and approaches in the early weeks of the COVID-19 pandemic. Online Learning Journal, 24(2), 6-21. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v24i2.2285

Joyce, B., & Weil, M. (2003). Models of teaching. New Delhi: Prentice- Hall of India.

Karpudewan, M., Treagust, D.F., Mocerino, M., Won, M., & Chandrasegaran, A.L. (2015). Investigating high school students’ understanding of chemical equilibrium concepts. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 10(6), 845-863.

Kucukozer, H., & Sabri Kocakulah. (2007). Secondary school students’ misconceptions about simple electric circuits. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 4(1), 101–115.

Luangrath, P., Pettersson, S., & Benckert, S. (2011). On the use of two versions of the force concept inventory to test conceptual understanding of mechanics in Lao PDR. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 7(2), 103-114. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75184

Mayer, J.R. (2012). Effect of using of concept attainment with inductive reasoning with high school biology students. Journal of Science Education 4, 100-112

Mestre, J. P. (2001). Implications of research on learning for the education of prospective science and physics teachers. Physics Education, 36(1), 44-51.

Nafidi, Y., Alami, A., Zaki, M., El Batri, B., & Afkar, H. (2018). Impacts of the use of a digital simulation in learning Earth sciences (The case of relative dating in High School). Journal of Turkish Science Education, 15(1), 89–108. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10223a

Purwanto, A dan Sasmita, R. (2013). Pembelajaran fisika dengan menerapkan model inkuiri terbimbing dalam menumbuhkan kemampuan berfikir logis siswa di SMA Negeri 8 Bengkulu. Prosiding Semirata FMIPA Universitas Lampung, 249-253.

Putri, D. N. A. O., Lian, B., & Pramika, D. (2020). Pengaruh model pembelajaran concept attainment terhadap hasil belajar siswa pada mata pelajaran ekonomi di SMA Srijaya Negara Palembang. Jurnal Neraca: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Ilmu Ekonomi Akuntansi, 3(1), 77-88. https://doi.org/10.31851/neraca.v3i1.3290

Putri, D. P. (2017). Model pembelajaran concept atatiment dalam meningkatkan pemahaman konsep matematika. Jurnal Pemikiran dan Penelitian pendidikan, 15(1), 97-130

Ravitz, J., & Blazevski, J. (2014). Assessing the role of online technologies in project-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 8(1), 65-79.

Sa’diyah, H. Indrawati, & Handayani, R.D. (2015). Model pembelajaran concept attainment disertai metode demonstrasi pada pembelajaran IPA-Fisika di SMP. Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika, 4(3), 224-229.

Samudra, G.B., Suastra, I.W., & Suma, K. (2014). Permasalahan permasalahan yang dihadapi siswa SMA di kota singaraja dalam mempelajari fisika. Jurnal Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Ganesh. 4(1), 1-7.

Sujarwanto, E. Hidayat, A. dan Wartono. (2014). Kemampuan pemecahan masalah fisika pada modeling instruction pada siswa SMA kelas XI. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 3(1), 65-78

Sukardjo, M., & Salam, M. (2020). Effect of concept attainment models and self-directed learning (SDL) on mathematics learning outcomes. International Journal of Instruction, 13(3), 275-292.

Savage, M., & Williams, J. (1990). Mechanics in action: Modelling and practical investigation. Cambridge University Press New York port Chester Melbourne Sydney.

Woolfolk, A. (2008). Education psychology. active learning edition, 10th Ed. (P. Soetjipto dan M. Soetjipto). Pustaka Pelajar.

Wulantri, Distrik, I. W., Suyatna, A., & Rosidin, U. (2020). The effectiveness of creative-inquiry-based student worksheet in improving physics self-efficacy and problem-solving of senior high school students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1467(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1467/1/012036




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24042/jipfalbiruni.v11i1.11775

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 112 | PDF downloads : 42

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License

Jurnal ilmiah pendidikan fisika Al-Biruni is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Copyright © Physics Education Department, Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampunge-ISSN 2503-023X