The Application of STAD- Cooperative Learning in Developing Integrated Science on Students Worksheet

Titik Rahayu, Syafrimen Syafril, Widya Wati, Yuberti Yuberti

Abstract


The application of Integrated teaching materials in teaching and learning science is very important, to support students acquire comprehensive knowledge and skills and make the learning process more memorable. Teachers must be good at choosing methods and packaging the teaching materials well to attract students' learning interests. This study aims to examine the analysis of the development of integrated Science on Student Worksheet using the steps of cooperative methods of Student Teams Achievement Divisions type. The study was conducted using a qualitative approach (Multi-case single-site case study design). The data were collected through analytical documents and analyzed thematically with NVIVO 10 software. The results showed that the steps to develop integrated science on Student Worksheet using cooperative method of Student Teams Achievement Divisions are: (1) In Student Worksheet there must be motivation and apperception; (2) team building; (3) presentations from teachers; (4) learning activities in teams must be heterogeneous; (5) implementation of individual quizzes; (6) awarding. The results of this study are discussed with various results of previous research.

Keywords


Integrated Science; type STAD; cooperative learning; students worksheet.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ajaja, O. P. (2002). Assessment of biology study support environments in schools. In STAN 41st Annual Conference Proceedings, 215-218.

Amornsinlaphachai, P. a. D., K. (2012). Developing the Model of Web-Based Learning Environment Enhancing Problem-Solving for Higher Education Students. American Journal of Scientific Research, 52, 21-32.

Anowar Hossain, R. A. T. (2013). Effects of cooperative learning on students’ achievement and attitudes in secondary mathematics. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93(2013), 473 – 477.

Arsyad, A. (2013). Media Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Remaja.

Bak-Kibar, Z. v. A., A. (2010a). Developing a worksheet about physical and chemical event. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 739-743.

Bak-Kibar, Z. v. A., A. (2010b). Implementing of a worksheet related to physical and chemical change concepts. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 733–738.

Bernaus, M. G., R.C. (2008). Teacher motivation strategies, student perceptions, student motivation, and English achievement. The Modern Language Journal, 92, 387-401.

Bozdogan, A. (2007). Fen bilgisi ogretiminde calısma yaprak-ları ile ogretimin ogrencilerin fen bilgisi tutumuna ve mantıksal dusunme becerilerine etkisi. Yayimlanmamis yuksek lisans tezi, Cukurova Universitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu, Adana.

Burhan, Y. (2008). Developing worksheets enriched by concept cartoons concerning the acid-base concepts. Karadeniz Technical University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences.

Calderhead, W. J., Filter, K. J., & Albin, R. W. (2006). An investigation of incremental effects of interspersing math items on task-related behavior. Journal of Behavioral Education, 15(1), 51–65.

Darlington, Y. S., Dorothy. (2002). Qualitative Research in Practice: Stories From the Field. Crows Nest: Allen & Unwin.

Elif Akdemir, A. A. (2012). From Past to Present: Trend Analysis of Cooperative Learning Studies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 55(2012), 212 – 217.

Fajola, O. O. (2000). Effect of three modes of computer Based instructional strategies on students learning outcomes in biology. University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria. Retrieved from Unpublished Ph.D thesis

Featherstone, H. (1986). Cooperative learning. Harvard Education Letter, 4-6.

Ghaith, G. (2003). Effects of the learning together model of cooperative learning on English as a Foreign Language reading achievement, academic self-esteem, and feelings of school alienation, American University of Beirut. Bilingual Research Journal, 27(3).

Gunes, G. v. A., A. (2005). Olusturmacı yaklasıma gore ta- sarlanan ogrenme ortamının matematik basarısına etkisi. Gazi Universitesi, Gazi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 25 (1), 105–121.

Isiaka Amosa Gambari, M. O. Y., David Akpa Thomas. (2015). Effects of Computer-Assisted STAD, LTM and ICI Cooperative Learning Strategies on Nigerian Secondary School Students' Achievement, Gender and Motivation in Physics. Akpa Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 3, 11-26.

Jacobs, G. (2006). Cooperative Learning and Second Language Teaching. Cambridge University Press.

Jegede, S. A. (2007). Student’s anxiety towards the learning of Chemistry in some Nigerian secondary schools. Educational Research and Review, 2(7), 193-197.

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1975). Learning together and alone. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Jonassen, D. K., H. (2001). Communication patterns in computer-mediated versus face-to-face group problem solving. Educational Technology Research & Devt, 49(11), 35 - 51.

Karamustafaoglu, O., Yaman, S. ve Karamustafaoglu, S. (2005). Fen ve teknoloji egitiminde ogrenme ve ogretim materyalleri. M. Aydogdu ve T. Kesercioglu (Ed.), İlkogretimde fen ve tekno-loji ogretimi icinde 212-234.

Kasíková, H. (2007). Kooperativní učení a vyučování. Teoretické a praktické problémy. Univerzita Karlova v Praze : Karolinum.

Keramati, M. (2010). Effect of cooperative learning on academic achievement of physics course. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 29(2), 155 -173.

Kisiel, J. (2003b). Teachers, museums and worksheets: A closer look at a learning experience. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 14(1), 3–21.

Kurikulum, P. (2006). Pembelajaran Tematik. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional

Lee, C. D. (2014). Worksheet usage, reading achievement, classes’ lack of readiness and science achievement: A cross-country comparison. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 2(2), 96-106.

Macarena Navarro-Pablo, E. J. G.-S. (2015). Teaching to training teachers through cooperative learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 180(2015), 401 – 406.

Majid, A. (2008). Perencanaan Pembelajaran Mengembangkan Standar Kompetensi Guru. Bandung: PT. Rosdakarya.

Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., Foy, P, & Stanco, G. M. (2012). TIMSS2011 international results in science. Chestnut Hill, M.A: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.

Moleong, L. J. (2007). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya Offset.

Noornia, A. (1997). Implementation of Cooperative Learning with STAD Method in Teaching Percent in Class IV SDI Maarif 02 Pematang Singosari. Malang.

Nur, M. (2005). Pembelajaran Kooperatif. Surabaya: Pusat Sains dan Matematika Sekolah UNESA.

Nur, M. (2008). Cooperative Learning. UNESA, Surabaya

Rahayu.P, S. M., dan Miswadi. (2012). Pengembangan Pembelajaran IPA Terpadu Dengan Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Problem Base Melalui Lesson Study. Program Pascasarjana.

Rimma A. Kutbiddinova, A. A. E., Marina A. Romanova. (2016). The Use of Interactive Methods in the Educational Process of the Higher Education Institution. International Journal Of Environmental & Science Education, 11(14), 6557-6572.

Saregar, A. (2016). Pembelajaran Pengantar Fisika Kuantum dengan Memanfaatkan Media PhET Simulation dan LKM Melalui Pendekatan Saintifik: Dampak pada Minat dan Penguasaan Konsep Mahasiswa. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 5(1), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.24042/jpifalbiruni.v5i1.105

Sasmaz-Oren, F. O., U. . (2012). An application about pre-service teachers' development and use of worksheets and an evaluation of their opinions about the application. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 12(1), 263-270.

Sharan, S. (1979). Cooperative learning in teams:A Critical review of 'recent methods and effects on achievement,attitudes, and race/ethnicrelations: Unpublished manuscript.

Slavin, R., K. (2010). Cooperative Learning. Universitas Johns Hopkins: Baltimore, MD, AS.

Slavin, R., K & Oickle. (1981). Effectsof Cooperative Learning Teams on Studen Achievement and Race Relations:Treatmentby Race Interactions. Sociology of Educa-tion, 54, 174-180.

Slavin, R. E. Cooverative Learning.Review of Educational Research,vs. in press.(a).

Slavin, R. E. (1978). StudentTeamsand Achievement Divisions. Journal of Researchand Development in Education, 12, 39-49.

Slavin, R. E. (1983). Student Team Learning: An Overview and Practical Guide. Washing-ton, D.C: National Education Association.

Slavin, R. E. (1988). Student team learning: An overview and practical guide (2 ed.). Washington D.C: National Education Association.

Slavin, R. E. (1990). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Slavin, R. E. (1991). Student team learning: A practical guide to cooperative learning (3 ed.).

Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative Learning : Theory, Research and Practice. Massachusetts: Allyn and Publishers.

Slavin, R. E. (2005). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Slavin, R. E. (2008). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Slavin, R. E. (2011). Instruction Based on Cooperative Learning. In R. E. Mayer, & P. A. Alexander (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Learning and Instruction. New York: Taylor & Francis.

Sugiharto. (2015). The Effect of Cooperative Learning Model and Kolb Learning Styles on Learning Result of The Basics of Politics. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(21).

Sugiyanto. (2007). Modul Guruan dan Latihan Profesi Guru (PLPG), Model-model Pembelajaran Inovatif. Panitia Sertifikasi Guru Rayon 13 Surakarta.

Taiwo, O. A. (2008). Relative effectiveness of ICI and CCI packages on the performance of students in senior secondary school mathematics in Minna. Unpublished B.Tech. Project, Department Science Education, Federal University of Technology, Minna.

Teemuangsai, M. T. S. (2013). Student Team Achievement Divisions (STAD) Technique through the Moodle to Enhance Learning Achievement. International Education Studies by Canadian Center of Science and Education, 6(4).

Teemuangsai, M. T. S. (2013). Student Team Achievement Divisions (STAD) Technique through the Moodle to Enhance Learning Achievement. International Education Studies, 6.

Tomlinson, B. (2012). Material Development for Language Learning and Teaching. Cambridge Journal Lang Teach, 45(2), 143-179.

Trianto. (2011). Model Pembelajaran Terpadu Konsep,Strategi dan Implementasinya dalam Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan (KTSP). Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Tutak, T. v. B., O. (2008a). Dinamik geometri yazılımı ile geometri ogretiminin ogrencilerin van heile geometri anlama du-zeylerine etkisi. 8th International Educational Technology Con- ference, Eskisehir(1058-1061).

Tutak, T. v. B., O. (2008b). Geometri ogretiminde bilgisa-yar destekli ogretimin ogrenci basarısına etkisi. 8th International Educational Technology Conference (s. 1062-1065), Eskisehir. Van Wyk, M. M. (2010). Do student teams achievement divisions enhance economic literacy? A quasi-experimental design. Journal of Social Science, 23(2), 83-89.

Yu, F. Y. (1998). The Effects of Cooperation With Inter-Group Competition on Performance and Attitudes in a Computer-Assisted Science Instruction. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, Charlottesville, VA: AACE., 17(4), 381-395.

Yusuf, M. O., & Afolabi, A. O. (2010). Effects of Computer Assisted Instruction (CAI) on Secondary School Students’ Performance in Biology. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9(1).




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24042/jipfalbiruni.v6i2.1933

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License

Jurnal ilmiah pendidikan fisika Al-Biruni is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.