Students Critical Thinking Skill in Solving Scientific Literacy using a Metacognitive Test Based on Scientific Literacy

Zakaria Sandy Pamungkas, Nonoh Siti Aminah, Fahru Nurosyid

Abstract


The purpose of this research is to measure students critical thinking skill in solving scientific literacy using a metacognitive test based on scientific literacy. This research is descriptive research. The subject of this research is 99 students of grade XI in SMA Batik 2 Surakarta. Data collection methods used are test methods which using a metacognitive test based on scientific literacy. Data analysis techniques use quantitative descriptive analysis. The results showed that the achievement of scientific literacy is still low at below 50% for all category. This is due to students critical thinking skill in solving all category of scientific literacy problem is still low. Low student critical thinking skill in solving science as a body of knowledge in the assessment stage with the percentage achievement is 21%. Low percentage achievement of critical thinking skill in solving science as a way of thinking is a clarification (34%), assessment (46%), inference (26%), and strategy (12%). Low percentage achievement of critical thinking skill in solving science as a way of investigating is assessment (39%), inference (5%), and strategy (6%). Low student critical thinking skill in solving science as an interaction between technology and society in the assessment stage with the percentage achievement is 31%

Keywords


critical thinking skill; metacognitive test; scientific literacy

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adawiyah, R., & Wisudawati, A. W. (2017). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Berbasis Literasi Sains : Menilai Pemahaman Fenomena Ilmiah Mengenai Energi. Indonesian Journal of Curriculum and Educational Technology Studies, 5(2), 112–121. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.15294/ijcets.v3i1.8675

Amin, B. D., Abdullah, H., & Malago, J. D. (2018). Sketch strategy of knowledge in physics learning and its influence on metacognitive. Educational Research and Reviews, 13(7), 230–235. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2017.3293

Asyhari, A. (2017). Literasi Sains Berbasis Nilai-Nilai Islam dan Budaya Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 6(1), 137. https://doi.org/10.24042/jpifalbiruni.v6i1.1584

Biemer, P. P., & Lyberg, L. E. (2003). Introduction to Survey Quality. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471458740

Chiappetta, E. L., Sethna, G. H., & Fillman, D. A. (1991). A quantitative analysis of high school chemistry textbooks for science literacy: Themes and expository learning aids. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(10), 939–951. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660281005

Duron, R., Limbach, B., & Waugh, W. (2006). Critical Thinking Framework For Any Discipline. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 17(2), 160–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2006.09.004

Good, R., Hafner, M., & Peebles, P. (2000). Scientific understanding of sexual orientation: implications for science education. The American Biology Teacher, 62(5), 326–330. https://doi.org/10.1662/0002-7685(2000)062[0326:SUOSOI]2.0.CO;2

Gotoh, Y. (2016). Development of critical thinking with metacognitive regulation. 13th International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning Digital Age, (Celda), 353–356. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED571408.pdf

Gurcay, D., & Ferah, H. O. (2018). High School Students’ Critical Thinking Related to Their Metacognitive Self-Regulation and Physics Self-Efficacy Beliefs. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 6(4), 125–130. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v6i4.2980

Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2009). The meaning of scientific literacy. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4(3), 275–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690601007549

Jacob, S. M., & Sam, H. K. (2008). Measuring critical thinking in problem solving through online discussion forums in first-year university mathematics. Imecs 2008: International Multiconference of Engineers and Computer Scientists, Vols I and Ii, I, 816–821.

Laurens, T. (2010). Penjenjangan Metakognisi Siswa yang Valid dan Reliabilitas. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 17(2), 201–213.

Lisdianto, D., Masykuri, M., & Aminah, N. S. (2015). Pengembangan Integrated Contextual Module (ICM) Untuk Meningkatkan Kreativitas Dan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Smk Pada Pokok Bahasan Sifat Mekanik Bahan (Pembelajaran Fisika Di SMK Veteran 1 Sukoharjo Tahun Ajaran 2014/2015). Jurnal Inkuiri, 4(4), 2252–7893. Retrieved from http://jurnal.fkip.uns.ac.id/index.php/sains

OECD. (2004). The PISA 2003 Assessment Framework. Oecd, 194. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264101739-en

Ogunkola, B. J. (2013). Scientific Literacy: Conceptual Overview, Importance, and Strategies for Improvement. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 3(1), 265–274. https://doi.org/10.5901/jesr.2013.v3n1p265

Rachmatullah, A., Diana, S., & Rustaman, N. Y. (2016). Profile of middle school students on scientific literacy achievements by using scientific literacy assessments (SLA). AIP Conference Proceedings, 1708(2016). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4941194

Rahmat Rasmawan. (2017). Profil Keterampilan Kerja Ilmiah dan Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMA di Kalimantan Barat. Edusains, 9(1), 60–70. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.15408/es.v9i1.4417

Rompayom, P., Tambunchong, C., Wongyounoi, S., & Dechsri, P. (2010). The Development of Metacognitive Inventory to Measure Students’ Metacognitive Knowledge Related to Chemical Bonding Conceptions. International Association for Educational Assessment (IAEA 2010), (Iaea), 1–7. Retrieved from http://selectscore.com/fullpaper/221.pdf

Rusilowati, A., Kurniawati, L., Nugroho, S. E., & Widiyatmoko, A. (2016). Developing an instrument of scientific literacy asessment on the cycle theme. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(12), 5718–5727.

Schraw, G. (1998). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. Instructional Science, 26(1), 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003044231033

Supeno, S., Subiki, S., & Rohma, L. W. (2018). Students’ Ability In Solving Physics Problems on Newtons’ Law of Motion. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 7(1), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.24042/jipfalbiruni.v7i1.2247

Udeani, U. (2013). Quantitative Analysis of Secondary School Biology Textbooks for Scientific Literacy Themes. Research Journal in Organizational Psychology & Educational Studies, 2(1), 39–43.

Warni, Sunyono, & Rosidin. (2018). Measuring metacognitive ability based on science literacy in dynamic electricity topic Measuring metacognitive ability based on science literacy in dynamic electricity topic. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 948. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/948/1/012041

White, B. B., Stains, M., Escriu-sune, M., Medaglia, E., & Rostamnjad, L. (2011). A Novel Instrument for Assessing. Journal of College Science Teaching, 40, 102–107.

Yanti, H., Distrik, I. W., Khasyyatillah, I., & Khasyyatillah, I. (2017). Profile of Senior High School Metacognitive Ability in Solving Problems of Abstraction on Physics Material. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 6(2), 241. https://doi.org/10.24042/jipfalbiruni.v6i2.2061

Yuniasti, A., & Wulandari, R. (2018). The Relationship Between Verbal Ability and Critical Thinking Skill: The Implementation of Susan Loucks Horsley Model. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 07(April), 89–97.

Zhang, L., & Kim, S. (2018). Critical Thinking Cultivation in Chinese College English Classes. English Language Teaching, 11(8), 1. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v11n8p1




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24042/jipfalbiruni.v7i2.2909

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License

Jurnal ilmiah pendidikan fisika Al-Biruni is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.