Prospective mathematics teachers’ understanding of proof in mathematics for high school

https://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v13i1.10089

Ade Mirza, Dona Fitriawan, Zubaidah R, Asep Nursangaji

Abstract


Changes in the mathematics education curriculum affect the preparation of prospective teachers to learn as well as possible and provide extensive opportunities and experiences regarding mathematical proof in secondary schools, especially those reflecting the nature and role of proof in the field of mathematics. Teachers' ability to respond to this depends on their understanding of proof in a mathematical context. This research examined the understanding of 36 prospective mathematics teachers at Tanjungpura University regarding proof and their ability to prove problems in the context of high school mathematics. The data were collected through a series of interviews focused on their responses to the role of proof and from tests to prove math problems. This research is descriptive-analytical research, which describes the conception of prospective mathematics teachers as knowledgeable in mathematics about proof. However, some view proof as a tool for studying mathematics. This research also found that many of them had a limited view of the nature of proof. They lacked a clear understanding of the subject of demonstrating or explaining the process of proving a mathematical statement.


Keywords


Belief; Comprehension; Conception; Proof; Secondary Mathematics.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Azkalia, R. (2018). Visual imagery strategy as effort to acquire comprehension. Jurnal Profesi Keguruan, 4(2), 135-141.

Bardini, C., Pierce, R., Vincent, J., & King, D. (2014). Undergraduate mathematics students’ understanding of the concept of function. Journal on Mathematics Education, 5(2), 85–107.

Bloch, E. D. (2011). Proofs and fundamentals: a first course in abstract mathematics. Springer Science & Business Media.

Branden, N. (1992). The Power of Self-Esteem: An Inspiring Look At Our Most Important Psychological Resource (Unabridged Edition). HCI.

Chazan, D. (1993). High school geometry students justify their views of empirical and mathematical proof. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 24(4), 359–387.

Conklin, W. (2011). Higher-order thinking skills to develop 21st century learners. Teacher Created Materials.

Doruk, M. (2019). Preservice mathematics teachers’ determination skills of proof techniques: the case of integers. International Journal of Education in Mathematics Science and Technology, 7(4), 335–348.

Durand-Guerrier, V., Boero, P., Douek, N., Epp, S. S., & Tanguay, D. (2012). Examining the role of logic in teaching proof. In Proof and proving in mathematics education (pp. 369-389). Springer, Dordrecht.

Farida, D. (2011). Developing students’ retelling story ability through collaborative learning techniques. Language Circle: Journal of Language and Literature, 5(2), 13–22.

Halpern, D. F. (2013). Thought and knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking. Psychology Press.

Hanna, G. (1990). Some pedagogical aspects of proof. Interchange, 21(1), 6–13.

Hanna, G. (1995). Challenges to the importance of proof. For the Learning of Mathematics, 15(3), 42–49.

Joseph, J. U. (2020). Adopting mathematics as a desired insrtument for the reduction of corruption in Nigeria. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies, 2(10), 821–827.

King, F. J., Goodson, L., Rohani, F. (2003). Higher Order Thinking Skills • Definition • Teaching Strategies • Assessment. A publication of the Educational Services Program, now known as the Center for Advancement of Learning and Assessment.

Knuth, E. J. (2002). Secondary school mathematics teachers’ conceptions of proof. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(5), 379–405.

Martin, G. W., & Harel, G. (1989). Proof frames of preservice elementary teachers. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20(1), 41-51.

Moseley, D., Baumfield, V., Elliott, J., Higgins, S., Miller, J., Newton, D. P., & Gregson, M. (2005). Frameworks for thinking: A handbook for teaching and learning. Cambridge University Press.

Mukuka, A., Mutarutinya, V., & Balimuttajjo, S. (2021). Mediating effect of self-efficacy on the relationship between instruction and students’ mathematical reasoning. Journal on Mathematics Education, 12(1), 73–92.

Noto, M. S., Priatna, N., & Dahlan, J. A. (2019). Mathematical proof: The learning obstacles of pre-service mathematics teachers on transformation geometry. Journal on Mathematics Education, 10(1), 117–125.

Rif’at, M., & Fitriawan, D. (2020). Enhancing visual abilities in solving mathematics problems. Journal of Engineering and Scientific Research, 2(1), 58-63.

Robson, A. (1946). Review of how to solve it [Review of review of how to solve it, by G. Pólya]. The Mathematical Gazette, 30(290), 181–182.

Sa’d, S. H. T (2014). Power distribution in EFL context: Probing the potential role of age and grade of study. The Iranian EFL Journal, 10, 442–457.

Schoenfeld, A. H. (2020). Mathematical practices, in theory and practice. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 52(6), 1163–1175.

Stylianides, A. J., & Stylianides, G. J. (2009). Proof constructions and evaluations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 72(2), 237–253.

Sumar, W. T., & Sumar, S. T. (2019). Implementasi program pengembangan keprofesian berkelanjutan guru melalui peningkatan kompetensi pembelajaran berbasis zonasi. Pedagogika, 10(2), 84–94.

Suriasumantri, J. S. (2010). Ilmu dalam Perspektif. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Todd, P., Lyublinskaya, I., & Ryzhik, V. (2010). Symbolic geometry software and proofs. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 15(2), 151–159.

Valleman, D. J. (2006). How to prove it: A structured approach, 2nd edition (2nd edition). Cambridge University Press.

Wallbank, A. J. (n.d.). Picture this: Re-thinking academic writing for learners with dyslexia. Centre for Development of Academic Skills (CeDAS).

Wu, H. H. (1996). The role of euclidean geometry in high school. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 15(3), 221–237.

Zohar, A., Degani, A., & Vaaknin, E. (2001). Teachers’ beliefs about low-achieving students and higher order thinking. Teaching and Teachers Education, 17(4), 469–485.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v13i1.10089

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 529 | PDF downloads : 364

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Al-Jabar : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Creative Commons License
Al-Jabar : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.