Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Asas:The Scientific Journal of Politics, Law, Syari’ah Economic Law and Islamic Culture ISSN 1979-1488 is a scientific journal Asas by the State Islamic University of Raden Intan Lampung. The purpose of this journal publication is of disseminate the latest theories and research results from all aspects that have been achieved in the fields of Politics, Law, Syari’ah Economic Law and Islamic Culture. This journal publishes useful works through a systematic process and can be accessed free of charge. Asas is indexed in Google Scholar, Garuda, Pangkalan, Crossref, Mendeley, Moraref, MoraBase, Grammarly, ISSUU.


Section Policies


Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Peer Review Process

Pengelola menyambut baik kontribusi dalam bentuk artikel dari para ilmuwan, sarjana, peneliti, dan profesional dalam disiplin ilmu  studi Politik, Hukum, Hukum Ekonomi Syari'ah dan Kebudayaan Islam untuk dipublikasikan dan disebarluaskan setelah mekanisme seleksi naskah, telaah beberapa mitra bebestari, dan proses penyuntingan yang ketat.

Setiap artikel yang masuk ke jurnal ini wajib menyerahkan Surat Pernyataan Keaslian Naskah (tidak pernah disubmit ke pihak lain/dan atau diterbitkan pihak lain, serta tidak mengandung unsur plagiasi) dan Copyright Transfer Agreement, ditandatangani asli, discan, dan diemail ke redaksi (jurnalasassyariah@radenintan.ac.id)

Seluruh artikel yang dipublikasikan dalam berkala ilmiah ini merupakan pandangan dari para penulisnya dan tidak mewakili berkala ilmiah atau lembaga afiliasi penulis.


Publication Frequency

Asas: Scientific Journal of Syari’ah Economic Law ISSN 1979-1488 is a scientific journal Asas by the State Islamic University of Raden Intan Lampung. The purpose of thes journal publication is of disseminate the latest theories and research results from all aspects that have been achieved in the field of Syari’ah Economic Law. This journal publishes useful works through a systematic process and can be accessed free of charge. Asas is indexed in Google Scholar, Garuda, Pangkalan, Crossref, Mendeley, Moraref, MoraBase, Grammarly, ISSUU.

Additional Site and Article Access Restrictions


Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.



This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...


Publication Ethic

Our ethic statements are based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

Publication decisions
The editor is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published.
The editor may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair play
An editor at any time evaluates manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions
Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity
Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of Sources
Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Duties of Authors

Reporting standards
Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.

Originality and Plagiarism
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication
An author should not, in general, publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgement of Sources
Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors.

The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or another substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works
When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.