PENGARUH PEMBERDAYAAN SUMBER DAYA MANUSIA DAN KOMPENSASI TERHADAP KINERJA PEGAWAI BAGIAN HUMAS KANWIL KEMENTERIAN AGAMA PROPINSI DKI JAKARTA

https://doi.org/10.24042/febi.v1i1.141

Heni Rohaeni

Abstract


Abstract-Performance problems are not limited to how much the organization is able to empower human resources as members of the organization to achieve the desired work but furthermore is how successful is the organization can encourage motivation and satisfaction of employees to work as much as possible so they can achieve the expected performance. One way to encourage motivation and employee satisfaction is the reward or remuneration in this case is compensated either directly or indirectly adequate, so that employees feel that the organization has noticed at once appreciate what they have done for the sake of the organization, with thus, the employee's performance will be achieved, but on the contrary, if the organization failed to give attention in this case the compensation of employees it is not impossible employees are not motivated to work so consequently performance is not achieved according to expectations of the organization and as a result of dissatisfaction of employees that compensation will make the performance more decreasses. Method research conducted in this study is a survey research design with quantitative research methods. That quantitative research is research conducted to determine the value of self, either one or more variables (independent) without making comparisons or connections between the variables of the other variables, whereas associative research is research that aims to determine the relationship between two or more variables, with emphasis see a causal relationship is a causal relationship. The results of this study variable data Empowerment of Human Resources showed that the lowest score of 67 and the highest score was 93. Thus, obtaining the highest and lowest scores, the range of scores (range) was 26 (93-67). Compensation variable data indicate that the lowest score was 51 and the highest score was 71. Thus, obtaining the highest and lowest scores, the range of scores (range) was 20 (71-51). for employee performance variable data shows that the lowest score was 55 and the highest score was 74. Thus, obtaining the highest and lowest scores, the range of scores (range) was 19 (74-55).


Full Text:

PDF

References


Clutterbuck, David, (2003), The art of HRD: The power of Empowerment, release the hidden talent of your Employees. Daya Pemberdayaan: Menggali dan meningkatkan potensi karyawan anda. Jakarta ; PT Gramedia.

Dessler, Gary, (2003), Manajemen Sumber daya Manusia (Alih bahasa: Benyamin Molan), Jakarta ; PT Prenhall Indonesia.

Dharma, Surya, (2009), Manajemen Kinerja Falsafah Teori dan Penerapannya. Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar.

Gomes, Faustino Cardoso, (2003), Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogyakarta ; Andi.

Handoko, T Hani, (2001), Manajemen Personalia dan Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogyakarta : BPFE.

Handoko, T Hani, (2003), Manajemen. Yogyakarta : BPFE

Hariandja, Marihot Tua Effendi, (2009), Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta : Grasindo.

Hasibuan, Malayu S.P, (2003), Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta : Bumi Aksara.

Heni, Rohaeni..2012. Pengaruh Pemberdayaan Sumber Daya Manusia Dan Kompensasi Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Bagian Humas Kanwil Kementerian Agama Propinsi Dki Jakarta. Jakarta: Tesis,Universitas Krisnadwipayana

Makmur, Syarif, (2008), Pemberdayaan Sumber Daya Manusia dan Efektivitas Organisasi. Jakarta : PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Mangkunegara, Prabu Anwar A.A, (2004), Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Bandung : Remaja Rosdakarya

Ndraha, Taliziduhu, (2004), Pengantar Teori Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta : Rineka Cipta.

Purwanto, Iwan, (2007), Manajemen Strategi. Bandung : Yrama Widya.

Rachmawati, Ike Kusdyah, (2008), Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogyakarta : Andi.

Robbins, Stephen P, (2003), Organizational Behavior. New Jersey : Prentice Hall.

Samsudin, Sadili, (2006), Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Bandung : Pustaka Setia.

Sastrohadiwiryo, B, Siswanto, (2003), Manajemen Tenaga Kerja Indonesia Pendekatan Administratif dan Operasional. Jakarta : Bumi Aksara.

Sedamaryanti, (2009), Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Reformasi Birokrasi dan Manajemen Pegawai Negeri Sipil. Bandung : PT Refika Aditama.

Sinaga, Anggiat M dan Hadiati, Sri, (2001). Pemberdayaan Sumber Daya Manusia (Bahan Ajar Diklat PIM Tk III). Jakarta : Balitbang.

Smith, Jane, (2000), Empowering People. London : Kogan Page Limited.

Sugiyono, (2007), Statistika untuk Peneltian. Bandung : Alfabeta.

Sugiyono, (2008), Metodelogi Penelitian Administrasi dan Metode R&D. Bandung : Alfabeta.

Sulistiyani, Ambar Teguh dan Rosidah, (2005), Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Konsep, Teori dan Pengembangan dalam Konteks Organisasi Publik. Yogyakarta :Graha Ilmu.

Usmara, A, (2002), Paradigma Baru Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogyakarta : Amara Books

Werther, William, B Jr dan Keith, Davis, (2001), Human Resources and Personel Management. New York : McGraw-Hill.Inc.

Wibowo, (2009), Manajemen Kinerja Edisi Kedua. Jakarta : PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Willbeforces, Turyasingura, (2000). “Graining a Competitive Advantaage Trought Employee Empowerment: Challenges and Stategies “. Yogyakarta : Gadjah Mada Internasional Journal Of Business, Vol. 2, No 1 Januari.

Yuniarsih, Tjutju dan Suwatno, (2008), Manajemen sumber Daya Manusia. Bandung : Alfabeta




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24042/febi.v1i1.141

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 1024 | PDF downloads : 576

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


IKONOMIKA INDEX :

 

More archive, citation & indexing...

IKONOMIKA is a Journal of Islamic Economics and Business, Published by the Faculty of Islamic Economics and Business at UIN RadenIntan Lampung - Indonesia. (http://ejournal.radenintan.ac.id/index.php/ikonomika/index). This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.