Analysis of Students Misconception in Completing Mathematical Questions Using Certainty of Response Index (CRI)

Elsa Meriani Waluyo, Arif Muchyidin, Hadi Kusmanto

Abstract


The misconception is a notion of an understanding that is inconsistent with a scientific notion or an interpretation of the relationship of unacceptable concepts. This study conducted to identify the misconception of students of class VIII MTs Negeri 9 Cirebon on the concept of a tangent circle. The research method used is a mixed method. Sampling using random sampling, so that obtained 48 student samples. The instruments used in this study were multiple choice objective tests accompanied by Certainty of Response Index (CRI) method and diagnosis interview. Based on its completeness, the analysis shows that misconceptions appear on sub concepts tangent of the circle of 34,5%, a tangent to two circles of 35,6%, an outer circle and an inner circle of the triangle of 33,3%. On average misconceptions that occur in students that are at sub concepts, tangent two circles on about ten percentage are 43,8%. This analysis shows that misconceptions in the student because students do not understand the concept fully and connecting one concept to another with partial understanding, resulting in the student, makes the wrong conclusions. Based on analysis of these data showed that the CRI effectively used to determine the misconceptions and effective diagnostic interview used in knowing the reason students are causing students had misconceptions.


Keywords


Certainty of Response Index (CRI); Misconceptions; Tangent circle

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Arikunto, S. (2012). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan (2nd ed.). Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Ausubel, D. P. (2000). The Acquisition and Retention of Knowledge : A Cognitive View. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage publications.

Diani, R., Latifah, S., Anggraeni, Y. M., & Fujiani, D. (2018). Physics Learning Based on Virtual Laboratory to Remediate Misconception in Fluid Material. Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan Dan Ilmu Tarbiyah, 3(2), 167–181. https://doi.org/10.24042/tadris.v3i2.3321

Djamarah, S. B. (2011). Psikologi Belajar (3rd ed.). Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Hasan, S., Bagayoko, D., & Kelley, E. L. (1999a). Misconceptions and the Certainty of Response Index (CRI). Journal of Psychology Education, V.

Hasan, S., Bagayoko, D., & Kelley, E. L. (1999b). Misconceptions and the Certainty of Response Misconceptions and the Certainty of Response Index ( CRI ). Journal of Science And Mathematics Education, 34(5), 294–299.

Hashweh, M. (1986). Toward An Explanation of Conceptual Change. European Journal of Science Education, 8(3).

Houtz, J. C., Moore, J. W., & Davis, J. K. (1973). The Effects of Different Types of Positive and Negative Instances in Concept Learning. In Journal of Education Psychology. Chicago: American Educational Research Association convention.

Istiyani, R., Muchyidin, A., & Raharjo, H. (2018). Analysis of Student Misconception on Geometry Concepts Using Three-Tier Diagnostic Test. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 37(2).

Kriswanto, A. (2013). Miskonsepsi Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Materi Lingkaran Kelas VIII MTs Taqwiyatul Wathon. IKIP PGRI Semarang.

Liliawati, W., & Ramalis, T. R. (2009). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Materi IPBA di SMA Dengan Menggunakan CRI (Certainly of Respons Index) Dalam Upaya Perbaikan Urutan Pemberian Materi IPBA Pada KTSP. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Penelitian, Pendidikan, Dan Penerapan MIPA, 159–168.

Long, M. (2000). The Psychology of Education. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.

Mahendrawan, E. (2012). Upaya Meningkatkan Miskonsepsi Siswa Melalui Metode Pembelajaran Delikan (Dengar, Lihat, Kerjakan) Pada Siswa Kelas VIII Semester Genap Smp Muhammadiyah 2 Surakarta. Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.

Mustaqim, T. A., Zulfiani, & Herlanti, Y. (2014). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa dengan Menggunakan Metode Certainty of Response Index (CRI) pada Konsep Fotosintesis dan Respirasi Tumbuhan Tri Ade Mustaqim, Zulfiani, Yanti Herlanti. Edusains, 6(2), 146–152. https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-9081-4-34

Mutia, M. (2017). Analisis Kesulitan Siswa SMP dalam Memahami Konsep Kubus Balok dan Alternatif Pemecahannya. Beta: Jurnal Tadris Matematika, 10(1), 83–102.

Ormrod, J. E. (2009). Psikologi Pendidikan Membantu Siswa Tumbuh dan Berkembang (1st ed.). Jakarta: Erlangga.

Palinggi, Y. (2016). Penentuan Nilai Half Value Layer (HVL) Dari Plate Aluminium Dengan Metode Variasi Ketebalan Filter Menggunakan Pesawat Linear Accelerator (LINAC). In Universitas Hasanuddin. Makassar: Universitas Hasanuddin.

Sagala, S. (2011). Konsep dan Makna Pembelajaran. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Slavin, R. E. (2011). Psikologi Pendidikan Teori dan Praktik. Jakarta: PT. Indeks.

Sudijono, A. (2010). Pengantar Statistik Pendidikan (XXII). Jakarta: Rajawali Press.

Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suparno, P. (2005). MIskonsepsi dan Perubahan Konsep Dalam Pendidikan Fisika. Jakarta: Grasindo.

Suparno, P. (2013). Miskonsepsi dan Perubahan Konsep Dalam Pendidikan Fisika. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia.

Tennyson, R. D., Woolley, F. R., & Merrill, M. D. (1972). Exemplar and nonexampler variables which produce correct concept classification behavior and specified classification errors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 63(2), 144–152.

Tristanti, L. B. (2017). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe TAI Dan Problem Based Learning (PBL) Terhadap Pemahaman Konsep Bangun Ruang Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika FKIP Univ. Muhammadiyah Metro, 6(3), 338–349.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24042/tadris.v4i1.2988

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License

Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan dan Ilmu Tarbiyah is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licensep-ISSN 2301-7562e-ISSN 2579-7964