Profile of Students' Errors in Mathematical Proof Process Viewed from Adversity Quotient (AQ)

Arta Ekayanti; Hikma Khilda Nasyiithoh

doi:10.24042/tadris.v3i2.3109

Profile of Students' Errors in Mathematical Proof Process Viewed from Adversity Quotient (AQ)

Arta Ekayanti, Hikma Khilda Nasyiithoh

Abstract

Mathematical proof is an important aspect in mathematics, especially in analysis. An error in the mathematical proof construction process often occurs. This study aims to analyze the students’ errors in producing proof. Each of the categories of students’ Adversity Quotient (AQ) is identified related to the type of students’ error. The type of students’ errors used according to Newmann’s Error Analysis. This study used a qualitative approach. This study was conducted to 25 students who were taking real analysis course. Documentation, test, and interview were used to gather the data. Analyzing the students’ test result and then interviewing them for each AQ category were done for the analysis process. The results show that there are 48% climber students, 52% camper students, and no one is identified as a quitter student. Climber students tend to make some proving error such as transformation error, process skill error, and encoding error while camper students make the comprehension error, transformation error, process skill error, and encoding error when they are producing proof.

Keywords

Adversity Quotient; Newmann Error Analysis; Students’ error

Full Text:

PDF

References

Ah, N. I. (2016). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Mata Kuliah Analisis Real Berbasis Pembuktian Pada Semester V UNMUH JEMBER. Jurnal Gammath, I Nomor 2, 26–32.

Azwar, S. (2002). Penyusun Skala Psikologi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar Offset.

Bagus Nur Iman, Toto Nusantara, D. (2016). Diagnosis Kesalahan Siswa Kelas XI SMA Negeri Candipuro pada Materi Penerapan Turunan Fungsi. In Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pembelajarannya (pp. 146–153). Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang.

Ekayanti, A. (2017). Diagnosis Kesalahan Mahasiswa Dalam Proses Pembuktian Berdasarkan Newmann Error Analysis. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(1), 105–116.

Guntur Suhandoyo, P. W. (2016). Profil Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Higher Order Thinking Ditinjau dari Adversity Quotient (AQ). MathEdunesa: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 3(5), 156–165.

Hernadi, J. (2016). Fondasi Matematika Dasar Berfikir Logis dan Kritis dalam Matematika. Ponorogo: UMPO Press.

Hidayat, W. (2017). Adversity Quotient dan Penalaran Kreatif Matematis Siswa SMA dalam Pembelajaran Argument Driven. KALAMATIKA, 2(1), 15–28.

Hidayat, W., Herdiman, I., Aripin, U., Yuliani, A., & Maya, R. (2018). Adversity Quotient ( AQ ) dan Penalaran Kreatif Matematis Mahasiswa Calon Guru. Jurnal Elemen, 4(2), 230–242. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v4i2.701

Indra Kurniawan, Kusmayadi, T. A., & Sujadi, I. (2015). Proses Berpikir Kreatif Siswa Climber dalam Pemecahan Masalah pada Materi Peluang ( Penelitian Pada Siswa Kelas XI IPA Semester II SMA Negeri I Polanharjo Tahun Ajaran 2014 / 2015 ), 3(6), 599–612.

Ko, Y. Y., & Knuth, E. (2009). Undergraduate mathematics majors’ writing performance producing proofs and counterexamples about continuous functions. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 28(1), 68–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2009.04.005

Leonard, L. (2017). Pengaruh Adversity Quotient (AQ) dan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Matematika, 28(April 2014).

Novilita, & Suharnan. (2013). Konsep Diri Adversity Quotient dan Kemandirian Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Psikologi, 8(1), 619–632.

Nurhayati. (2015). Pengaruh Adversity Quotient dan Motivasi Berprestasi Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Matematika. Jurnal Formatif, 3(1), 72–77.

Rukmana, I., & Paloloang, B. (2016). Hubungan Adversity Quotient dengan Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa Kelas XI SMA Negeri Model Terpadu Madani Palu, 3(3), 325–333.

Sari, C. K., Sutopo, S., & Aryuna, D. R. (2016). The Profile of Students’ Thinking in Solving Mathematics Problems Based on Adversity Quotient. Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education, 1, 36–48.

Sari, C. K., Waluyo, M., Ainur, C. M., & Darmaningsih, E. N. (2018). Logical errors on proving theorem. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 948(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/948/1/012059

Sari, D. P., Darhim, D., & Rosjanuardi, R. (2018). Errors of Students Learning with React Strategy in Solving The Problems of Mathematical. Journal on Mathematics Education, 9(1), 121–128.

Stavrou, S. G. (2014). Common Error and Misconceptions in Mathematical Proving by Education Undergraduates. Issues in the Undergraduate Mathematics Preparation of School Teachers, 1(March), 1–8.

Stefanowich, A. (2014). Proofs and Mathematical Reasoning. University of Birmingham.

Stoltz. (2000). Mengubah Hambatan Menjadi Peluang. Jakarta: Grasindo.

Sucipto, L., & Mauliddin. (2016). Analisis Kesulitan Mahasiswa dalam Memahami Konsep Bilangan Real. Beta Jurnal Tadris Matematika, 9(2).

Sukoriyanto, S., Nusantara, T., Subanji, S., & Chandra, T. D. (2016). Students’ Errors in Solving the Permutation and Combination Problems Based on Problem Solving Steps of Polya. International Education Studies, 9(2), 11. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n2p11

Wardiana, W. dan S. Z. (2014). Hubungan Antara Adversity Quotient (AQ) dan Minat Belajar dengan Prestasi Belajar Matematika pada Siswa Kelas V SD di Kelurahan Pedugan. Jurnal Mimbar PGSD Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, 2(1).

Wijaya, A., Heuvel-panhuizen, M. Van Den, Doorman, M., & Robitzch, A. (2014). Difficulties in solving context-based PISA mathematics tasks : An analysis of students ’ errors. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 11(3), 555–584. https://doi.org/10.1139/t02-118

Yani, M., Ikhsan, M., & Marwan, M. (2016). Proses Berpikir Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Berdasarkan Langkah-langkah Polya. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(1), 43–58.

Yanti, A. P., Koestoro, B., & Sutiarso, S. (2018). The Students’ Creative Thinking Process based on Wallas Theory in Solving Mathematical Problems viewed from Adversity Quotient /Type Climbers. Al Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 9(1), 51–61.

Yanti, A. P., & Syazali, M. (2013). Analisis Proses Berpikir Siswa dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Berdasarkan Langkah-Langkah Bransford dan Stein Ditinjau dari Adversity Quotient. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(3), 64.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24042/tadris.v3i2.3109

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.

Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan dan Ilmu Tarbiyah is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. p-ISSN 2301-7562 | e-ISSN 2579-7964