Learning Environment: Gender Profile of Students' Pro-Environmental Behavior (PEB) based on Green Consumerism


Ilmi Zajuli Ichsan, Diana Vivanti Sigit, Mieke Miarsyah


The damage to nature and the changing situation of the surrounding environment certainly make you anxious. The role of students in safeguarding nature is certainly one of the important points in determining the sustainability of green consumerism. The purpose of this study is to see the influence of gender in the students' Pro-Environmental Behavior (PEB) in understanding the concept of green consumerism. The research was conducted in July-August 2018. The research was located at State Junior High School (SMPN) 1 of South Tambun, Bekasi, West Java, Indonesia. The method used was a survey with simple random sampling to obtain 214 samples consisted of 107 male students and 107 female students. PEB score of male students was 63.86 and 64.34 for female students. Data analysis used was t-test with a confidence level of 95%. The results of the t-test showed that there were no differences in green consumerism in terms Pro-Environmental Behavior between male and female. This shows that there needs to be an effort in evaluation by the teachers to improve the male and female students Pro-Environmental Behavior.


Environmental learning; Gender; Green consumerism; Pro-Environmental Behavior

Full Text:



Abood, S. A., Lee, J. S. H., Burivalova, Z., Garcia-Ulloa, J., & Koh, L. P. (2015). Relative Contributions of the Logging, Fiber, Oil Palm, and Mining Industries to Forest Loss in Indonesia. Conservation Letters, 8(1), 58–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12103

Amaral, J. A. A. D., & Santos, R. J. R. L. D. (2018). Combining project-based learning and community-based research in a research methodology course: The lessons learned. International Journal of Instruction, 11(1), 47–60.

Arnold, O., Kibbe, A., Hartig, T., & Kaiser, F. G. (2018). Capturing the Environmental Impact of Individual Lifestyles: Evidence of the Criterion Validity of the General Ecological Behavior Scale. Environment and Behavior, 50(3), 350–372. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916517701796

Blaschke, L. M. (2014). Using Social Media to Engage and Develop The Online Learner in Self-Determined Learning. Research in Learning Technology, 22(1), 1–23.

Boholano, H. B. (2017). Smart Social Networking: 21st Century Teaching And Learning Skills. Research in Pedagogy, 7(1), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.17810/2015.45

Chander, P., & Muthukrishnan, S. (2015). Green consumerism and pollution control. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 114, 27–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2015.02.013

Dangelico, R. M., Pujari, D., & Pontrandolfo, P. (2017). Green Product Innovation in Manufacturing Firms: A Sustainability-Oriented Dynamic Capability Perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(4), 490–506. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1932

Ferguson, J. M. (2017). Middle school students’ reactions to a 1:1 iPad initiative and a paperless curriculum. Education and Information Technologies, 22(3), 1149–1162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-016-9480-2

Freed, A. (2018). The relationship between university students’ environmental identity, decision-making process, and behavior. Environmental Education Research, 24(3), 474–475. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2017.1320705

Geçer, A. K. (2014). A study on information search and commitment strategies on web environment and internet usage sekf efficacy beliefs of university students’. The Turkish Online of Educational Technology, 13(2), 1–17.

Gu, W., Chhajed, D., Petruzzi, N. C., & Yalabik, B. (2015). Quality design and environmental implications of green consumerism in remanufacturing. International Journal of Production Economics, 162, 55–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.12.040

Gullberg, A., Andersson, K., Danielsson, A., Scantlebury, K., & Hussénius, A. (2018). Pre-Service Teachers’ Views of the Child—Reproducing or Challenging Gender Stereotypes in Science in Preschool. Research in Science Education, 48(4), 691–715. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9593-z

Gündüz, A. Y., Alemdağ, E., Yaşar, S., & Erdem, M. (2016). Design of a Problem-Based Online Learning Environment and Evaluation of its Effectiveness. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 15(3), 49–57. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Han, H., & Yoon, H. J. (2015). Hotel customers’ environmentally responsible behavioral intention: Impact of key constructs on decision in green consumerism. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 45, 22–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2014.11.004

Hidayati, N., & Wuryandari, A. I. (2012). Media Design for Learning Indonesian in Junior High School Level. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 67, 490–499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.354

Ichsan, I. Z., Dewi, A. K., Hermawati, F. M., & Iriani, E. (2018). Pembelajaran IPA dan Lingkungan: Analisis Kebutuhan Media Pembelajaran pada SD, SMP, SMA di Tambun Selatan, Bekasi. JIPVA (Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Veteran), 2(2), 131–140. https://doi.org/10.31331/jipva.v2i2.682

Ichsan, I. Z., Iriani, E., & Hermawati, F. M. (2018). Peningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi (Higher Order Thinking Skills) Pada Siswa Sekolah Dasar Melalui Video Berbasis Kasus Pencemaran Lingkungan. Edubiotik: Jurnal Pendidikan, Biologi Dan Terapan, 3(02), 12–18.

Ichsan, I. Z., & Mulyani, S. W. W. (2018). Improving Students’ Motoric Skills Through Demonstration Method in Recycling Plastic Waste. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 4(2), 189–194. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v4i2.5890

Ito, H., & Kawazoe, N. (2015). Active Learning for Creating Innovators: Employability Skills beyond Industrial Needs. International Journal of Higher Education, 4(2), 81–91. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v4n2p81

Iwata, H., Tsuzuki, S., Iwata, M., & Terasawa, T. (2017). Ketoacidosis due to a Low-carbohydrate Diet in an Elderly Woman with Dementia and Abnormal Eating Behavior. Internal Medicine, 56(19), 2671–2675. https://doi.org/10.2169/internalmedicine.8689-16

Jewpanich, C., & Piriyasurawong, P. (2015). Project-Based Learning Using Discussion and Lesson-Learned Methods via Social Media Model for Enhancing Problem Solving Skills. International Education Studies, 8(6), 24–31. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n6p24

Jiang, B., Yang, J., Lv, Z., Tian, K., Meng, Q., & Yan, Y. (2017). Internet cross-media retrieval based on deep learning. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation, 48, 356–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvcir.2017.02.011

Jonell, M., Crona, B., Brown, K., Rönnbäck, P., & Troell, M. (2016). Eco-labeled seafood: Determinants for (blue) green consumption. Sustainability, 8(9), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8090884

Kaiser, F. G., & Wilson, M. (2004). Goal-directed conservation behavior: The specific composition of a general performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(7), 1531–1544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2003.06.003

Kamaludin, S., Surtikanti, H. K., & Surakusumah, W. (2018). Developing Issue-Based Teaching Materials to Improve Student Learning Outcomes in Freshwater Biology Course. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 4(2), 161–170.

Kanchanabhandhu, C., & Woraphong, S. (2016). A model of solid waste management based multilateral co-operation in semi-urban community. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(12), 5762–5775.

Khoiriyah, A. J., & Husamah, H. (2018). Problem-based learning: Creative thinking skills, problem-solving skills, and learning outcome of seventh grade students. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 4(2), 151–160. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v4i2.5804

Krettenauer, T. (2017). Pro-Environmental Behavior and Adolescent Moral Development. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 27(3), 581–593. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12300

Lavelle, M. J., Rau, H., & Fahy, F. (2015). Different shades of green? Unpacking habitual and occasional pro-environmental behavior. Global Environmental Change, 35, 368–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.09.021

Lekakos, G., Vlachos, P., & Koritos, C. (2014). Green is good but is usability better? Consumer reactions to environmental initiatives in e-banking services. Ethics and Information Technology, 16(2), 103–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-014-9337-6

Lou, S.-J., Chou, Y.-C., Shih, R.-C., & Chung, C.-C. (2017). A Study of Creativity in CaC2 Steamship-derived STEM Project-based Learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(6), 2387–2404. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01231a

Margono, B. A., Potapov, P. V., Turubanova, S., Stolle, F., & Hansen, M. C. (2014). Primary forest cover loss in indonesia over 2000-2012. Nature Climate Change, 4(8), 730–735. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2277

Matthes, J., & Wonneberger, A. (2014). The skeptical green consumer revisited: Testing the relationship between green consumerism and skepticism toward advertising. Journal of Advertising, 43(2), 115–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2013.834804

McCarthy, B., & Liu, H. B. (2017). Food waste and the ‘green’ consumer. Australasian Marketing Journal, 25(2), 126–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2017.04.007

Meishar-Tal, H., & Shonfeld, M. (2018). Students’ writing and reading preferences in a paperless classroom. Interactive Learning Environments, 0(0), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1504306

Meyer, A. (2016). Heterogeneity in the preferences and pro-environmental behavior of college students: The effects of years on campus, demographics, and external factors. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 3451–3463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.133

Morganti, L., Pallavicini, F., Cadel, E., Candelieri, A., Archetti, F., & Mantovani, F. (2017). Gaming for Earth: Serious games and gamification to engage consumers in pro-environmental behaviours for energy efficiency. Energy Research and Social Science, 29(April), 95–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.05.001

Owens, D. C., Sadler, T. D., Barlow, A. T., & Smith-Walters, C. (2017). Student Motivation from and Resistance to Active Learning Rooted in Essential Science Practices. Research in Science Education, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9688-1

Paço, A., & Gouveia Rodrigues, R. (2016). Environmental activism and consumers’ perceived responsibility. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 40(4), 466–474. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12272

Price, C. A., Kares, F., Segovia, G., & Loyd, A. B. (2018). Staff matter: Gender differences in science, technology, engineering or math (STEM) career interest development in adolescent youth. Applied Developmental Science, 0(0), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2017.1398090

Reyna, J., Hanham, J., & Meier, P. (2018). The Internet explosion, digital media principles and implications to communicate effectively in the digital space. E-Learning and Digital Media, 15(1), 36–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753018754361

Said, A., & Syarif, E. (2016). The Development of Online Tutorial Program Design Using Problem-Based Learning in Open Distance Learning System. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(18), 222–229.

Sangroya, D., & Nayak, J. K. (2017). Factors influencing buying behaviour of green energy consumer. Journal of Cleaner Production, 151, 393–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.010

Sax, L. J., Lehman, K. J., Jacobs, J. A., Kanny, M. A., Lim, G., Monje-Paulson, L., & Zimmerman, H. B. (2017). Anatomy of an Enduring Gender Gap: The Evolution of Women’s Participation in Computer Science. The Journal of Higher Education, 88(2), 258–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2016.1257306

Seechaliao, T. (2017). Instructional Strategies to Support Creativity and Innovation in Education. Journal of Education and Learning, 6(4), 201. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v6n4p201

Silva, D. A. L., Pavan, A. L. R., Oliveira, J. A. De, & Ometto, A. R. (2015). Life cycle assessment of offset paper production in Brazil: Hotspots and cleaner production alternatives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 93, 222–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.01.030

Steinhorst, J., & Klöckner, C. A. (2017). Effects of Monetary Versus Environmental Information Framing: Implications for Long-Term Pro-Environmental Behavior and Intrinsic Motivation. Environment and Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916517725371

Ting, D. H., & Cheng, C. F. C. (2017). Measuring the marginal effect of pro-environmental behaviour: Guided learning and behavioural enhancement. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education, 20(July 2015), 16–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2016.12.001

Truelove, H. B., & Gillis, A. J. (2018). Perception of pro-environmental behavior. Global Environmental Change, 49(February), 175–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.02.009

Tyabaev, A. E., Sedelnikova, S. F., & Voytovich, A. V. (2015). Student-Centered Learning: The Experience of Teaching International Students in Russian Universities. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 215(June), 84–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.578

van der Veen, C., & van Oers, B. (2017). Advances in research on classroom dialogue: learning outcomes and assessments. Learning and Instruction, 48, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.04.002

Vincent-Ruz, P., & Schunn, C. D. (2017). The increasingly important role of science competency beliefs for science learning in girls. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(6), 790–822. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21387

Yavich, R., & Starichenko, B. (2017). Design of Education Methods in a Virtual Environment. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 5(9), 176. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v5i9.2613

Yu, T. Y., Yu, T. K., & Chao, C. M. (2017). Understanding Taiwanese undergraduate students’ pro-environmental behavioral intention towards green products in the fight against climate change. Journal of Cleaner Production, 161, 390–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.115

Yusop, F. D., & Sumari, M. (2013). The Use of Social Media Technologies among Malaysian Youth. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 103, 1204–1209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.448

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24042/tadris.v3i2.3358

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 1468 | PDF downloads : 387


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License

Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan dan Ilmu Tarbiyah is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Copyright © Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung. All rights reservedp-ISSN 2301-7562e-ISSN 2579-7964