Development of Lecturer Performance Evaluation Tools in the Implementation of Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka

Maman Nurjaman, Udin Syaefudin Sa’ud, Eka Prihatin, Endang Herawan

Abstract


This research aims to develop a model for assessing lecturer performance that includes tools, evaluation standards, standard-setting, computer programs, assessment standards, and instructions for using evaluation results. This is a development project. Nine experts approved the instrument design before using Aiken's V formula to determine content validity, exploratory factor analysis to determine construction validity, and Cronbach's alpha to determine reliability. The study's findings revealed that: 1) the entire instrument meets the criteria for validity; 2) an instrumental analysis of the teacher's instructional activities revealed reliability of the preparation, implementation, and evaluation components of 0.843; and finally, 3) the effectiveness of teaching, the efficacy of research, the efficacy of dedication to the community, and the qualifications of lecturers were all taken into account when evaluating the efficiency of the lecturer's employment.

Keywords


performance levels, quality management, Universitas Bhakti Kencana

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abidin, M. (2021). Stakeholders evaluation on educational quality of higher education. International Journal of Instruction, 14(3), 287–308. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14317a

Abu-Rabia, S., & Abu-Rahmoun, N. (2012). The role of phonology and morphology in developing basic reading skills of dyslexic and normal native Arabic readers. Creative Education, 3(7), 1259–1268. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2012.37185

Adler, R., Roberts, H., Crombie, N., & Dixon, K. (2021). Determinants of accounting students’ undergraduate learning satisfaction. Accounting and Finance, 61(4), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12756

Aiken, L. R. (1985). Three coefficients for analyzinganalyzing the reliability and validity of ratings, Educational and Psychological Measurument. Journal Articles; Reports - Research; Numerical/Quantitative Data, 45(1), 131–142.

Armstrong, M. (2000). Performance Management: Key strategies and practical guidelines (2nd ed.). Kogan Page Business Books.

Berk, R. A. (1986). Performance assessment: Methods & applications (R. A. Berk (ed.)). Johns Hopkins University Press.

Budiastuti, E., Sugiyono, & Jerusalem, M. A. (2019). Quality analysis of final test in the faculty engineering of Yogyakarta State University. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1273(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1273/1/012047

Cardoso, S., Rosa, M. J., & Stensaker, B. (2016). Why is quality in higher education not achieved? The view of academics. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(6), 950–965. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1052775

Cranston, J. (2019). Improving the outcomes of the “Prediction Problem”: A framework approach to teacher hiring. American Journal of Educational Research, 7(7), 455–462. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-7-7-4

Cronbach, L. J. (1980). Essentials of psychological testing (4th (ed.)). Harper & Row.

Dani, A. A., Hikmawati, A., & Fathan, F. (2019). Implementasi Digital Assurance dalam Peningkatan Mutu Pendidikan di Sastra Inggris IAIN Surakarta. Jurnal Penjaminan Mutu, 5(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.25078/jpm.v5i1.721

Evans, C. (2013). Making sense of sssessment feedback in Higher Education. Review of Educational Research, 83(1), 70–120. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312474350

Forbes, M., Alderman, L., & Murphy, A. (2022). Course enhancement conversations: A holistic and collaborative evaluation approach to quality improvement in higher education. Evaluation Journal of Australasia, 22(4), 221–236.

Harvey, L., & Green, D. (1993). Defining Quality. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 18(1), 9–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293930180102

Herawati, J., & Rinofah, R. (2019). Faktor-Faktor yang mempengaruhi kinerja dosen untuk mencapai “career ready professional.” Akmenika: Jurnal Akuntansi dan Manajemen, 13(2), 148–155. https://doi.org/10.31316/akmenika.v16i2.395

Jones, J., Jenkin, M., & Lord, S. (2006). Developing effective teacher performance. Paul Chapman Publishing. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446213155

Kane, J. S., & Freeman, K. A. (1997). A theory of equitable performance standards. Journal of Management, 23(1), 37–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639702300103

Kartiwi, A. P., Nupan, A., & Romlan. (2021). A Learning Quality in Master Program of Educational Administration. Proceedings of the International Conference on Educational Sciences and Teacher Profession (ICETeP 2020), 532(532), 73–77. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210227.012

Krumrei-Mancuso, E. J., & Rouse, S. V. (2016). The development and validation of the comprehensive intellectual humility scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98(2), 209–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2015.1068174

Lin, Q., Zhu, Y., Lu, H., Shi, K., & Niu, Z. (2021). Improving University Faculty Evaluations via multi-view Knowledge Graph. Future Generation Computer Systems, 117, 181–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2020.11.021

Lin, X. F., Hwang, G. J., Wang, J., Zhou, Y., Li, W., Liu, J., & Liang, Z. M. (2022). Effects of a contextualizedcontextualized reflective mechanism-based augmented reality learning model on students' scientific inquiry learning performances, behavioural patterns, and higher order thinking. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2057546

Malik, R. S. (2019). Pathway to rigorous teacher training and effective teaching for better student outcomes. Journal of Sustainable Development Education and Research, 3(1), 23–42. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsder.v3i1.17170

Mananuwe, B. I., Salamor, L., & Tuharea, J. (2022). Evaluasi kepala sekolah tentang kinerja Guru PKn yang sudah sertifikasi dan yang belum sertifikasi di sekolah SMA Negeri 19 Seram Bagian Barat Kecamatan Taniwei Timur. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 6(2), 10749–10755. https://www.jptam.org/index.php/jptam/article/view/4131%0Ahttps://www.jptam.org/index.php/jptam/article/view/4131/3465

Nicol, D., Thomson, A., & Breslin, C. (2014). Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: A peer review perspective. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(1), 102–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.795518

Retnowati, T. H., Mardapi, D., Kartowagiran, B., & Hamdi, S. (2021). A Model of Lecturer Performance Evaluation: Sustainable Lecturer Performance Mapping. International Journal of Instruction, 14(2), 83–102. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.1426a

Rince, & Sitorus, S. A. (2022). Upaya meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa melalui penerapan metode jigsaw pada pelajaran PKn Siswa Kelas Kelas VIII SMP Swasta Cerdas Mandiri. Edusaintek: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains, dan Teknologi, 9(1), 264–277.

Schindler, L., Puls-Elvidge, S., Welzant, H., & Crawford, L. (2015). Definitions of Quality in Higher Education: A Synthesis of the Literature. Higher Learning Research Communications, 5(3), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.18870/hlrc.v5i3.244

Shafa. (2014). Karakteristik proses pembelajaran Kurikulum 2013. Dinamika Ilmu, 14(32), 99–102. https://doi.org/, 14(10.1061/(ASCE)0733 -9410(1991)117.

Struyven, K., Dochy, F., & Janssens, S. (2010). Students’ perceptions about evaluation and assessment in higher education: A review. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(4), 325–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930500099102

Sujudi, N., Gaffar, M. F., Komariah, A., & ... (2022). Strategy of fulfilling the needs of quality college lecturer. Journal of Positive …, 6(8), 483–494. https://www.journalppw.com/index.php/jpsp/article/view/9755%0Ahttps://www.journalppw.com/index.php/jpsp/article/download/9755/6368

Tapia-Leon, M., Rivera, A. C., Chicaiza, J., & Luján-Mora, S. (2018). Application of ontologies in higher education: A systematic mapping study. 2018 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 1344–1353. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2018.8363385

Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Siddiq, F., & Scherer, R. (2016). Time for a new approach to prepare future teachers for educational technology use: Its meaning and measurement. Computers & Education, 94, 134-150. Computers & Education, 94, 134–150. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131515300816

Torlak, N. G., Demir, A., & Budur, T. (2022). Decision-making, leadership and performance links in private education institutes. Rajagiri Management Journal, 16(1), 63–85. https://doi.org/10.1108/RAMJ-10-2020-0061

Rencana Induk Pengembangan UBK 2019-2034, (2019).

Upadhyay, S., & Upadhyay, N. (2016). A multi-criteria decision framework to measure spiritual intelligence of university teachers. Procedia Computer Science, 91(Itqm), 591–598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.07.150

Yang, Z. (2022). An investigation about the challenges of adopting performance management in educational leadership in England. Journal of Education and Development, 6(3), 67–71.

Yusaini, Y., Darmawati, D., Mahyiddin, M., & Zainuddin, Z. (2021). Implementation of PTKIN Quality Ansurance: Performance improvement efforts through motivation and job satisfaction in Aceh. Edukasi Islami: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 10(01), 473–500. https://doi.org/10.30868/ei.v10i01.1426




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24042/002023141680400

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Copyright (c) 2023 Al-Tadzkiyyah: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

 Creative Commons License
Al-Tadzkiyyah: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyright © UIN Raden Intan Lampung. All rights reserved.