Ghanaian indigenous conception of real mathematics education in mathematics teaching and learning

Authors

  • Clement Ayarebilla Ali University of Education, Winneba

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24042/ijsme.v4i1.7382

Keywords:

four trends of mathematization, indigenous conception, real mathematics education, mathematics teaching and learning

Abstract

Ghana's rich cultural heritage has not been fully incorporated into mathematics education despite its potential to enhance students' understanding of mathematical concepts. This study explores the integration of Ghanaian cultural elements, including signs, symbols, artifacts, and technology, into mathematics teaching using the Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) approach. A quasi-experimental design with non-equivalent groups was employed, involving 80 students in the experimental group and 70 in the control group. The experimental group was taught using four real mathematics trends, while the control group followed a traditional approach. Data were collected through pretest and posttest assessments, and statistical analysis was conducted using ANOVA and MANCOVA. Findings reveal that Ghanaian indigenous culture is primarily represented through signs, symbols, artifacts, instruments, tools, and technology, with signs and symbols playing the most significant role in supporting students' mathematical understanding. The study concludes that integrating local cultural elements into mathematics teaching enhances students’ problem-solving abilities and deepens their appreciation of cultural heritage. The implications of this study highlight the necessity of incorporating indigenous cultural elements into mathematics instruction to create a more meaningful and contextually relevant learning experience, ultimately fostering both academic success and cultural preservation.

References

T. Meaney, C. McMurchy-Pilkington and T. Trinick, “Indigenous Students and the Learning of Mathematics”, Research in Mathematics Education in Australasia 2008–2011 pp 67-87, 2012.

T.G. Bartell, K.N. Bieda, R.T. Putnam, K. Bradfield and H. Dominguez (Eds.), Indigenous Knowledge Provides an Elegant Way to Teach the Foundations of Mathematics. Proceedings of the 37th annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University, 2015.

P.C. Yong, Y.K. Jiar and N.A.A. Zanzali, “Mathematics Remediation for Indigenous Students With Learning Difficulties: Does It Work?”.US-China Education Review A, 1022-1033, 2012.

YuMi Deadly Centre, Accelerated Indigenous Mathematics, Commonwealth of Australia, YuMi Deadly Centre, Queensland University of Technology, 2014.

K. Duchscherer, S. Palmer, K. Shemrock and D. Vankoughnett, “Culture-Based School Mathematics for Reconciliation and Professional Development”.Indigenous Culture-Based School Mathematics: Project Report 287, July 2019.

R. Wemegah, “Boosting the Bolgatanga Basketry Industry: Inputs from the India-Africa Craft Design Initiative”, International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies, 9(2), 897-905, 2014.

D. Tall, How humans learn to think mathematically, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.

C.A. Ali, E.K. Davis and D.D. Agyei, D.D.,“Transition from Instrumental Genesis to Anthropological Theory of Didactics in the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics in Basic Schools”. In Pope, S. (Ed.). British Congress of Mathematics Education (pp.30- 34),University of Warwick, United Kingdom, March 2018.

L. S. Vygotsky, Tool and sign in the development of the child. In R. W. Rieber (ed.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky, Volume 6 (pp. 3-68). New York: Kluwer Academic, 1999.

C.A. Ali, “Harnessing Indigenous Basketry Resources for Prenumber and Early Number Work” Journal of Education and Learning, 7(2), 210-220, June 2018.

H. Freudenthal, Didactical Phenomenology of Mathematical Structures. Dordrecht: Riedel Publishing Company, 1983.

E. Matusov, “Irreconcilable differences in Vygotsky’s and Bakhtin’s approaches to the social and the individual: an educational perspective”,Culture & Psychology,17(1), 99– 119, 2011.

M. Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, P. Drijvers, M. DoormanandM. Van Zanten, Reflections from abroad on the Netherlands didactic tradition in mathematics education. Freudenthal Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, 2016.

A. Fauzan, Applying realistic mathematics education (RME) in teaching geometry in Indonesian primary schools, PhD Dissertation, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands, 2002.

A.J. Bishop, H. Bauersfeld, B.J. Kilpatrick, G. Leder, S. T., Krakow and G. Vergnaud. G. (eds.). Revisiting Mathematics Education: China Lectures. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002.

E. K. Davis and S. Chaiklin, S.“A radical-local approach to bringing cultural practices into mathematics teaching in Ghanaian primary schools, exemplified in the case of measurement”. African Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics and Sciences, 11, 2015.

H. Barnes, “The theory of Realistic Mathematics Education as a theoretical framework for teaching low attainers in mathematics”,Pythagoras 61 (1),42-57, 2005.

L.T. Anh, Applying Realistic Mathematics Education in Vietnam: Teaching middle school geometry, PhD Dissertation InstitutfürMathematikLehrstuhlfür, Didaktik der Mathematik, 2006.

M. Van den Heuvel-Panhuizenand P. Drijvers, “Realistic Mathematics Education”. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education, Dordrecht, Heidelberg, New York, London: Springer, 2011.

M. Turgut,“Theory of semiotic mediation in teaching and learning linear algebra: In search of a viewpoint in the use of ICT”. Ninth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME 9), Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Education; ERME, Prague, Czech Republic.pp.2418-2424, Feb 2015.

E. K. Davis, M. E. Carr and E. Ampadu, Valuing in Mathematics Learning Amongst Ghanaian Students: What Does It Look Like Across Grade Levels? In: Clarkson P., Seah W., Pang J. (eds) Values and Valuing in Mathematics Education. ICME-13 Monographs. Springer, Cham, 2019.

W. T. Seah, Values in the mathematics classroom: Supporting cognitive and affective pedagogical ideas. Gazi Journal of Education, 1(1), 45-63, 2013.

J. W. Creswell, Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach (4ed), Washington DC: SAGE Publications, Inc., 2014.

C. A. Ali, Didactical Conceptual Structures in Extending the Triad to the Tetrahedron Exemplified in the Teaching and Learning of Equations of the Circle, PhD Thesis, University of Cape Coast, unpublished 2019.

O. Viirman, The function concept and university mathematics teaching. PhD Dissertation, Karlstad University Studies, Germany, 2014.

J. Ruge and R. Hochmuth, “How do pre-service teachers experience math didactics courses at university?” In Göller, R., Biehler, R., Hochmuth, R., Rück, H.-G. (Eds.), Didactics of Mathematics in Higher Education as a Scientific Discipline – Conference Proceedings, Kassel, Germany: Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, 2017.

D. Subedi, “Explanatory Sequential Mixed Methods Design as the Third Research Community of Knowledge Claim”, American Journal of Educational Research,i 4(7), 570-577, 2016.

N. Walliman, Research methods: the basics. New York: Routledge, 2011.

H. J. Seltman, Experimental Design and Analysis, New Delhi: Sage, 2015.

T. Yu, An exploratory factor analysis and reliability analysis of the student online learning readiness instrument. Online Learning, 19(5), 120-141, 2015.

H. J. Seltman, Experimental design and analysis, New Delhi: Sage, 2015.

B. Caswell, Teaching Toward Equity in Mathematics, PhD Thesis, University of Toronto, 2011.

Downloads

Published

31-03-2021

How to Cite

Ghanaian indigenous conception of real mathematics education in mathematics teaching and learning. (2021). Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4(1), 37-47. https://doi.org/10.24042/ijsme.v4i1.7382