The Secular State: An Epistemological Approach to The An-Na’im’s Political Thought

Authors

  • Mohamad Latief Universitas Darussalam Gontor
  • Ahmad Rizqi Fadlilah Univeritas Darussalam Gontor
  • Rd Adityawarman Universitas Darussalam Gontor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24042/002023171447200

Keywords:

Epistemology, Political Thought, Secular State, Abdullahi Ahmed An-Na’im

Abstract

This article aims to reveal the political thoughts of Abdullahi Ahmed An-Na'im regarding the concept of a secular state. The material object of this study is An-Na'im's political thought in the form of a secular state concept which is reviewed using epistemology as its formal object. The results of this study explain that: first, the basic assumption of An-Na'im's political thought is a post-secularist worldview. Second, the paradigm is anthropocentric positivism. Third, the framework is constitutionalism, human rights, and citizenship. All these three are used by An-Na'im primarily to make sharia relevant to the context of a modern state. Viewed from an Islamic perspective, the epistemology of An-Na'im's political thought is problematic because after all, post-secularism is still rooted in the principle of separation of state and religion. Making post-secularism a basic assumption is a form of confusion in perspective. Making anthropocentric positivism a paradigm also means placing human knowledge as the main truth. Likewise, framing sharia within the framework of constitutionalism, human rights, and citizenship is a step that has the potential to ignore aspects of the maslahat contained in sharia.

References

An-Na’im, Abdullahi Ahmed. “Constitutionalism and Islamization in the Sudan in Sharia Law and Strife in the Sudan: Is Peace Possible?” Africa Today 36, no. 3–4 (1989).

———. Islam and the Secular State: Negotiating the Future of Sharia. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2008.

———. “Islamic Law, International Relations, and Human Rights: Challange and Response.” Cornell International Law Journal 20, no. 2 (1987).

———. Toward an Islamic Reformation: Civil Liberties, Human Rights, and International Law. New York: Syracusae University Press, 1990.

An-Na’im, Abdullahi Ahmed, and Mohamed Arkoun. Dekonstruksi Syariah: Kritik Konsep Penjelasan Lain. Translated by Farid Wajidi. Yogyakarta: LKiS, 1993.

Attar, Suehyla el-. Curriculum Vitae: Professor Abdullahi Ahmed An-Na’im, Ph.D. Atlanta: School of Law Emory University, 2005.

Attas, Syed Muhammad Naquib al-. Islam and Secularism. Kuala Lumpur: ISTAC, 1995.

———. Risalah Untuk Kaum Muslimin. Kuala Lumpur: ISTAC, 2001.

Bonhoeffer, Dietrich. Prisoner for God: Letters and Papers from Prison. Translated by Reginald Fuller. New York: The MacMillan Company, 1959.

Busyro. “Abdullahi Ahmed An-Na’im Dan Konsep Pemikiran Hukum Liberalnya.” Jurnal Al-Hurriyyah 15, no. 2 (2014).

Comte, Auguste. A General View of Positivism. Translated by John H. Bridges. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.

Cox, Harvey. The Secular City: Secularization and Urbanization in Theological Perspective. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2013.

Gogarten, Friedrich. Christ the Crisis: Basic Questions Concerning Christology. Translated by R.A. Wilson. Virginia: SCM Press, 1970.

Imarah, Muhammad. Al-Islam Wa Ushul al-Hukm Li Ali Abdur Raziq: Dirasah Wa Wasa`iq. Beirut: Mu`assasah al-’Arabiyyah, 2000.

Jalil, Abdul Aziz Nasser al-. Wa Kadzalika Ja’alnakum Ummatan Wasathan. Riyadh: Dar al-Thayyibah, 1425.

Karim, Khalil Abdul. Al-Islam Bayna al-Dawlah al-Diniyyah Wa al-Dawlah al-Madaniyyah. Cairo: Sina Press, 1995.

Khoir, Tolkhatul. “Titik Temu Pemikiran Mahmoud Mohamed Thaha Dan Abdullahi Ahmed An-Na’im.” International Journal Ihya` ’Ulum al-Din 18, no. 1 (September 2017).

Muslih, Mohammad. Falsafah Sains: Dari Isu Integrasi Keilmuan Menuju Lahirnya Sains Teistik. Yogyakarta: LESFI, 2017.

———. “Sains Islam Dalam Diskursus Filsafat Ilmu.” Kalam 8, no. 1 (June 2014).

Plato. Protagoras. Translated by Jowett Benjamin. New York: The Bobbs Merrill, 1956.

Reder, Michael, and Josef Schmidt. “Habermas and Religion.” In An Awareness of What Is Missing: Faith and Reason in Post-Secular Age, by Jurgen Habermas. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2010.

Safi, Louay M. Al-Aqidah Wa al-Siyasah: Ma’alim Nadzariyyah ‘Ammah Li al-Dawlah al-Islamiyyah. Virginia: IIIT, 1996.

Shaltut, Mahmud. Al-Islam Aqidah Wa Syari’ah. Cairo: Dar al-Syarq, 1968.

Syanqithi, Muhammad al-Amin al-. Al-Muhadharat. Mecca: Dar ’Ilm al-Fawa`id, 1426.

Thaha, Mahmoud Mohamed, and Mahmoud Mohamed An-Na’im. The Second Massage of Islam. New York: Syracusae University Press, 1987.

Usman, Zulkifli Abdurrahman, and Baiquni Hasbi. “Neo-Sekularisme Dalam Pemikiran Abdullahi Ahmed An-Na’im: Studi Tentang Relasi Islam Dan Negara.” Politea Jurnal Pemikiran Politik Islam 05, no. 1 (2022).

Weir, Todd H. “Germany Amd the New Global History of Secularism: Questioning the Postcolonial Genealogy.” The Germanic Review: Literature, Culture, Theory 90, no. 01 (January 2015).

Zuckerman, Phil, and John R. Shook. The Oxford Handbook of Secularism. New York: Oxford University Press, 2017.

Zulkifli. Pemikiran Abdullah Ahmed An-Na’im Tentang Relasi Islam Dan Negara. Tangerang: Pustaka Pedia, 2020.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

31-12-2023

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

The Secular State: An Epistemological Approach to The An-Na’im’s Political Thought. (2023). Kalam, 17(2), 191-210. https://doi.org/10.24042/002023171447200