Hydra effects predator-prey bazykin's model with stage-structure and intraspecific for predator
Abstract
Bazykin's predator-prey population model is considered to represent the exchange stability condition of population growth. The existence of the hydra effect and, at the same time, analyzing its influence on population growth. The condition of the model divides the species into a stage structure, namely, prey, immature predators, and mature predators. The population growth of the three species has its own characteristics. This research revealed that the Holling type II and intraspecific predatory function responses together induce the Hydra effect. In the model formed, there are 12 equilibrium points, with details for every seven points of negative imaginary equilibrium and five points of non-negative equilibrium. The findings of research studies center on five points of non-negative equilibrium. All real roots that interpret the species population's growth conditions are taken and tested for long-term stability. The test results show one point of equilibrium that meets the Routh-Hurwitz criteria and their characteristic equations. In numerical simulations, the maximum sustained yield is in the local asymptotic stable state. The growth of prey trajectories increased significantly, although at the beginning of the interaction there was a slowdown in population growth. Meanwhile, the population of immature predators and mature predators was not significantly different. Both populations grow steadily toward the point of population stability. It turns out that the two populations grow inversely, the faster the rate of predation by predators, the faster the growth rate of the prey population.References
Adhikary, P. Das, Mukherjee, S., & Ghosh, B. (2021). Bifurcations and hydra effects in bazykin’s predator–prey model. Theoretical Population Biology, 140(xxxx), 44–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tpb.2021.05.002
Anjos, L. dos, Costa, M. I. da S., & Almeida, R. C. (2020). Characterizing the existence of hydra effect in spatial predator-prey models and the influence of functional response types and species dispersal. Ecological Modelling, 428(April), 109109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109109
Bajeux, N., & Ghosh, B. (2020). Stability switching and hydra effect in a predator–prey metapopulation model. BioSystems, 198, 104255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystems.2020.104255
Cortez, M. H., & Abrams, P. A. (2016). Hydra effects in stable communities and their implications for system dynamics. Ecology, 97(5), 1135–1145. https://doi.org/10.1890/15-0648.1
Cortez, M. H., & Yamamichi, M. (2019). How (co)evolution alters predator responses to increased mortality: Extinction thresholds and hydra effects. Ecology, 100(10), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.2789
Esteves, P. V, & Caxias, D. De. (2021). Multiple stage hydra effect in a stage – structured prey–predator model. 1–12.
Garain, K., & Mandal, P. S. (2021). Bubbling and hydra effect in a population system with allee effect. Ecological Complexity, 47(May), 100939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2021.100939
Iskin da S. Costa, M., & Dos Anjos, L. (2018). Multiple hydra effect in a predator–prey model with allee effect and mutual interference in the predator. Ecological Modelling, 373(November 2017), 22–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2018.02.005
Lee, A. H., Fraz, S., Purohit, U., Campos, A. R., & Wilson, J. Y. (2020). Chronic exposure of brown (hydra oligactis) and green hydra (hydra viridissima) to environmentally relevant concentrations of pharmaceuticals. Science of the Total Environment, 732, 139232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139232
Liz, E., & Sovrano, E. (2022). Stability, bifurcations and hydra effects in a stage-structured population model with threshold harvesting. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 109(January), 106280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2022.106280
Lu, M., Xiang, C., Huang, J., & Wang, H. (2022). Bifurcations in the diffusive bazykin model. Journal of Differential Equations, 323, 280–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2022.03.039
Martcheva, M. (2015). An introduction to mathematical epidemiology. Springer, New York.
Pal, D., Ghosh, B., & Kar, T. K. (2019). Hydra effects in stable food chain models. BioSystems, 185(December 2018), 104018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystems.2019.104018
Pratama, R. A., Fransina, M., Ruslau, V., & Musamus, U. (2022). Application of beddington deangelis response function in ecological mathematical system: Study fish endemic oliv predator species in merauke. JTAM (Jurnal Teori Dan Aplikasi Matematika), 6(1), 51–60.
Sieber, M., & Hilker, F. M. (2012). The hydra effect in predator-prey models. Journal of Mathematical Biology, 64(1–2), 341–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-011-0416-6
Weide, V., Varriale, M. C., & Hilker, F. M. (2019). Hydra effect and paradox of enrichment in discrete-time predator-prey models. Mathematical Biosciences, 310, 120–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mbs.2018.12.010
Copyright (c) 2022 Desimal: Jurnal Matematika
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
As an Author of the journal, you have the rights to a variety of uses of your article, including use by the institute or company you work for. These Author Rights may be exercised without the need for specific permission.
Authors and readers may copy and redistribute material in any medium or format, as well as remix, modify, and construct material for any purpose, even commercially, but they must give due credit (quote article or content), provide links to the license, and state if changes have been made. If you remix, modify or build material, you must distribute your contribution under the same license as the original.
Authors who submit manuscripts do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, the copyright of the article must be submitted to Decimal: The Journal of Mathematics as the publisher of the journal.
