Teachers' Perceptions of Physics Scientific Argumentation Test Instruments Based on Modern Test Theory Using Question Modeling Through E-Learning Edpuzzle LMS

Alda Novita Sari, Viyanti Viyanti, Chandra Ertikanto

Abstract


The study aims to understand teachers' perceptions of scientific argumentation test instruments in physics based on modern test theory using question modelling through Edpuzzle LMS e-learning. It employed a mixed method with a Sequential Explanatory Design. Data were collected through questionnaires and analyzed descriptively. Initially, it was found that 75% of teachers had not developed assessment instruments capable of optimally training students, resulting in 68% of students struggling to understand physics learning. Additionally, 54% of students reported having identified and solved complex physics problems using scientific argumentation, while 46% had not. Based on survey results, 95% of students and teachers agreed that assessment activities encourage scientific argumentation, indicated by identifying scientific issues and explaining scientific phenomena. Hence, there is a need for a physics scientific argumentation test model based on modern test theory. For future research, it is suggested to explore how integrating this test model in different educational settings impacts students' scientific argumentation skills and understanding of physics concepts.

Keywords


Edpuzzle, e-learning, modern test theory, scientific argumentation test

Full Text:

PDF

References


I. W. Redhana, “Menyiapkan Lulusan FMIPA yang Menguasai Keterampilan Abad XXI,” Proc. Semin. Nas. FMIPA UNDIKSHA V, vol. V, no. 1, pp. 138–155, 2015.

A. R. Saavedra and V. D. Opfer, “Learning 21st-century skills requires 21st-century teaching,” Phi Delta Kappan, vol. XCIV, no. 2, pp. 8–13, 2012.

D. Clark et al., “Online learning environments, scientific argumentation, and 21st century skills,” in E-Collaborative knowledge construction: Learning from computer-supported and virtual environments, vol. I, no. 2, pp. 1–39, 2010.

H. A. Yacoubian and R. Khishfe, “Argumentation, critical thinking, nature of science and socioscientific issues: a dialogue between two researchers,” Int. J. Sci. Educ., vol. XL, no. 7, pp. 796–807, 2018.

R. Katsh‐Singer, K. L. McNeill, and S. Loper, “Scientific argumentation for all? Comparing teacher beliefs about argumentation in high, mid, and low socioeconomic status schools,” Sci. Educ., vol. C, no. 3, pp. 410–436, 2016.

A. Betari, A. Hasanati, F. Fuadah, M. T. Amir, and P. Parno, “Students’ Learning Motivation through the Quality of Scientific Argumentation Skills and Students’ Cognitive Learning Outcomes on Newton’s Laws: A Relationship Analysis,” J. Ilm. Pendidik. Fis. Al-BiRuNi, vol. X, no. 1, pp. 71–84, 2021.

O. S. Mubarok, M. Muslim, and A. Danawan, “Pengaruh model pembelajaran berbasis masalah dengan pendekatan saintifik terhadap kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah siswa SMA pada materi pengukuran,” in Prosiding SNPS (Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Sains), vol. III, no. 3, pp. 381–388, 2016,

R. E. Putri, “Meningkatkan kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah siswa SMP Kelas VII melalui bahan ajar IPA terpadu dengan tema HALO pada topik kalor,” SEMESTA J. Sci. Educ. Teach., vol. I, no. 1, pp. 34–46, 2018.

M. Aydeniz and Z. Ozdilek, “Assessing Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Understanding of Scientific Argumentation: What Do They Know about Argumentation after Four Years of College Science?.,” Sci. Educ. Int., vol. XXVI, no. 2, pp. 217–239, 2015.

B. B. Frey, J. D. Ellis, J. A. Bulgreen, J. C. Hare, and M. Ault, “Development of a Test of Scientific Argumentation.,” Electron. J. Sci. Educ., vol. 19, no. 4, p. n4, 2015.

A. Fauziah, E. F. D. Sobari, and B. Robandi, “Analisis pemahaman guru sekolah menengah pertama (smp) mengenai asesmen kompetensi minimum (AKM),” Edukatif J. Ilmu Pendidik., vol. III, no. 4, pp. 1550–1558, 2021.

M. A. Fauzi, “E-learning in higher education institutions during COVID-19 pandemic: current and future trends through bibliometric analysis,” Heliyon, vol. VIII, no. 5, pp. 1-10, 2022.

F. Alfarisa and D. N. Purnama, “Analisis butir soal ulangan akhir semester mata pelajaran ekonomi SMA menggunakan Rasch model,” J. Pendidik. Ekon. Undiksha, vol. XI, no. 2, pp. 366–374, 2019.

N. Sudjana, Metode Statistika Edisi keenam. Bandung : PT. Tarsito, 2005.

V. S. G. Silverajah and A. Govindaraj, “The use of Edpuzzle to support low-achiever’s development of self-regulated learning and their learning of chemistry,” in Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Education Technology and Computers, vol. X, no. 3, pp. 259–263, 2018.

D. Eliana and S. Admoko, “Tren Pembelajaran Argumentasi Berbasis Toulmins Argument Pattern (TAP) dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Argumentasi dan Pemahaman Konsep Fisika Peserta Didik,” Inov. Pendidik. Fis., vol. IX, no. 2, pp. 246–255, 2020.

M. I. S. Nasution, H. S. D. Lubis, Y. Tanjung, and A. A. B. Nasution, “Development of Infographic-Based Minimum Competency Assessment Instruments For High School Students In Medan City,” Int. J. Educ. Res. Soc. Sci., vol. II, no. 6, pp. 1439–1450, 2021.

D. Darmaji, A. Astalini, D. Dwi Agus Kurniawan, R. Perdana, and D. S. Putra, “A Study Relationship Attitude Toward Physics, Motivation, and Character Discipline Students Senior High School in Indonesia,” Int. J. Learn. Teach., vol. II, no. 1, pp. 1-9, 2019.

N. S. Galugu and S. Samsinar, “Academic self-concept, teacher’s supports and student’s engagement in the school,” J. Psikol. Pendidik. Konseling Vol, vol. V, no. 2, pp. 141–147, 2019.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24042/ijsme.v6i3.18991

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Copyright (c) 2023 Unit Riset dan Publikasi Ilmiah FTK UIN Raden Intan Lampung

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License

Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.