Improving mathematical communication and critical thinking in middle school students: Study of anchored instruction learning assisted by edpuzzle

Annisa Nurina Vidyastuti, Baiduri Baiduri, Siti Inganah, Emmanuel Hagenimana

Abstract


Background: Mathematics learning often appears unattractive to students due to its monotonous, intimidating, and boring nature. Active engagement in learning mathematics requires students to effectively utilize their communication and critical thinking skills.
Aim: This study aims to 1) analyze the critical thinking abilities of students in a learning context, 2) assess their written and oral mathematical communication abilities, 3) evaluate their critical thinking skills in problem-solving, and 4) explore the impact of the Anchored Instruction learning setting assisted by Edpuzzle on these competencies.
Method: Employing a descriptive qualitative research design, this study involved 24 VII-H grade students from SMPN 8 Malang. Data were collected using observation sheets, worksheets, and test questions.
Results: The study indicates significant improvements in students’ critical thinking and mathematical communication skills. Critical thinking, observed through increased and more sophisticated student participation, was categorized as high in 5 students, medium in 16, and low in 3. Similarly, in mathematical communication, 5 students excelled, 13 were above average, and 6 were below average. This progression exhibited the effectiveness of the Anchored Instruction learning setting assisted by Edpuzzle in enhancing these skills.
Conclusion: The study concludes that the Anchored Instruction learning setting, supported by Edpuzzle, significantly enhances students' critical thinking and mathematical communication abilities. This approach has proven effective in engaging students more actively in the learning process and improving their problem-solving skills.


Keywords


Critical Thinking Ability; Mathematical Communication Ability; Anchored Instruction Learning; Edpuzzle

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abou Afach, S., Kiwan, E., & Semaan, C. (2018). How to enhance awareness on bullying for Special Needs Students using “Edpuzzle” a web 2.0 tool. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 3(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.372260

Aini, N. R., Syafril, S., Netriwati, N., Pahrudin, A., Rahayu, T., & Puspasari, V. (2019). Problem-Based Learning for Critical Thinking Skills in Mathematics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1155(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1155/1/012026

Alsalamah, N. A. (2022). Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis dalam Pembelajaran Flipped Classroom Bernuansa Etnomatematika Berbantuan Edpuzzle. ANARGYA: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.24176/anargya.v5i1.7578

Amaliah. (2020). IMPLEMENTATION OF EDPUZZLE TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ ANALYTICAL THINKING SKILL IN NARRATIVE TEXT. Prosodi, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.21107/prosodi.v14i1.7192

Ariyanto, L. (2011). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Matematika Model Berjangkar (Anchored Instruction) Materi Luas Kubus dan Balok Kelas VIII. Aksioma: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika UPGRIS Semarang, 2(2).

Astiantari, I., Pambudi, D. S., Oktavianingtyas, E., Trapsilasiwi, D., & Murtikusuma, R. P. (2022). KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KRITIS SISWA SMP DALAM MENYELESAIKAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI ADVERSITY QUOTIENT ( AQ ). AKSIOMA : Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 11(2), 1270–1281.

Aurelyasari, S., & Nur, I. R. D. (2023). Analisis Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa SMP pada Materi Aljabar. Radian Journal: Research and Review in Mathematics Education, 1(3), 127–134. https://doi.org/10.35706/rjrrme.v1i3.7153

Bai, X., & Lavin, J. (2019). Designing Anchored Instructions via Virtual Role Playing. International Journal of E-Education, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learning, 9(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.17706/ijeeee.2019.9.1.1-8

Beard, L., & Aghassibakes, N. (2021). Edpuzzle. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 109(1), 159–161. https://doi.org/dx.doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2021.1202

Bransford, J., Crews, T. R., Biswas, G., & Goldman, S. (1997). Anchored Interactive Learning Environments. Journal of AI in Education.

Bransford, J. D., Sherwood, R. D., Hasselbring, T. S., Kinzer, C. K., & Williams, S. M. (1990). Anchored Instruction: Why We Need It and How Technology. In Cognition, Education, and Multimedia (1st Editio, p. 28).

Cahyati, I., Kuntadi, D., & Mulhayatiah, D. (2019). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Anchored Instruction Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Peserta Didik Pada Materi Kalor. Journal of Teaching and Learning Physics, 1(1), 19–23. https://doi.org/10.15575/jotalp.v1i1.3434

Chen, C.-Y., & Global. (2013). An exploration of developing active exploring and problem solving skill Lego Robot Course by the application of anchored instruction theory. Educational Research and Reviews, 8(17). https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR012.153

CHEN, J. (2018). Application of Anchored Instruction in Higher Vocational ESP Course. DEStech Transactions on Social Science, Education and Human Science, icaem, 279–282. https://doi.org/10.12783/dtssehs/icaem2017/19088

Dadri, P. C. W., Dantes, N., & Gunamantha, I. M. (2019). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe NHT terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dan Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa Kelas V SD Gugus III Mengwi. PENDASI: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Indonesia, 3(2), 84–93.

Dalimunthe, S. A. S., Mulyono, M., & Syahputra, E. (2022). Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Interaktif Berbasis Think Pair Share untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(1), 735–747. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v6i1.1229

Duron, R., Limbach, B., & Waugh, W. (2006). Critical thinking framework for any discipline. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 17(2), 160–166.

Elcin, M., & Sezer, B. (2014). An exploratory comparison of traditional classroom instruction and anchored instruction with secondary school students: Turkish experience. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 10(6). https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1171a

Emiliya Hidayat, L., & Dzulfiqar Praseno, M. (2021). Improving Students’ Writing Participation and Achievement in an Edpuzzle-Assisted Flipped Classroom. Education of English as Foreign Language, 4(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.educafl.2021.004.01.01

Facione, A. . (1994). Holistic Critical Thinking Scoring Rubric. California Academia Press, 19, 2007.

Fadila, N., & Hasbi, R. M. B. S. M. (2019). Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa melalui Model Pembelajaran Anchored Instruction di SMPN 1 Darul Imarah Aceh Besar. 4(3), 282–291.

Faiziyah, N., & Priyambodho, B. legawo. (2022). ANALISIS KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KRITIS DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SOAL HOTS DITINJAU DARI METAKOGNISI SISWA. AKSIOMA : Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 11(4), 2823–2835.

Faradina, A. T. E., Sunardi, & Trapsilasiwi, D. (2016). Analisis Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa Dalam Memahami Masalah Segiempat. Kadikma : Bachelor Of Mathematics Education Universitas Jember, 7(1), 46–56.

Florentina, N., & Leonard, L. (2017). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis Siswa. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 7(2), 96–106. https://doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v7i2.1877

Hartanto, B., & Reye, J. (2019). Anchored instruction ITS: A novel approach to make learning programming interesting and effective. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 703(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/703/1/012048

Hendriana, H., & Kadarisma, G. (2019). Self-Efficacy dan Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa SMP. JNPM (Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Matematika), 3(1), 153. https://doi.org/10.33603/jnpm.v3i1.2033

Hochholdinger, S., & Schaper, N. (2013). Training troubleshooting skills with an anchored instruction module in an authentic computer based simulation environment. Journal of Technical Education, 1(1), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.48513/joted.v1i1.11

John E. McPeck. (1981). Critical Thinking and Education. St. Martin’s Press.

John W. Santrock. (2011). Psikologi pendidikan (2nd ed.). Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Kabeakan, I. M., Bambang S, R. ., & Suhartati. (2018). Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa pada Materi Segiempat di Kelas VIII SMP Muhammadiyah Subulussalam Tahun Ajaran 2017/2018. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Matematika, 3(2), 97–103.

Kurniawan, D., Yusmin, E., & Hamdani. (2017). Deskripsi kemampuan komunikasi matematis siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita kontekstual. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 6(2), 1–11.

Liu, M., Xie, T., & Ding, J. (2020). Applying anchored instruction in crowdsourcing platforms to promote career competence of digital media students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1646(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1646/1/012011

Mahadewi, N. K. N., Ardana, I. M., & Mertasari, N. M. S. (2020). Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Melalui Model Reciprocal Teaching Berbantuan Media Interaktif. JNPM (Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Matematika), 4(2), 338. https://doi.org/10.33603/jnpm.v4i2.3606

Mardhiyanti, D., Ilma, R., & Kesumawati, N. (2013). Pengembangan Soal Matematika Model Pisa Untuk Mengukur Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.5.1.334.

Meryansumayeka, M., Zulkardi, Z., Putri, R. I. I., & Hiltrimartin, C. (2021). Students’ Strategies in Solving PISA Mathematical Problems Reviewed from Problem-Solving Strategies. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 15(1), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.15.1.10405.37-48

NCTM. (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Virginia: United States of America.

Ningtyas, E. Z. (2021). MATHEMATICS COMMUNICATION JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS IN SOLVING OPEN-ENDED QUESTION BASED ON REFLECTIVE-IMPULSIVE COGNITIVE STYLE. EduTeach : Jurnal Edukasi Dan Teknologi Pembelajaran, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.37859/eduteach.v2i1.2410

Nurjanah, S. A. (2019). ANALISIS KOMPETENSI ABAD-21 DALAM BIDANG KOMUNIKASI. GUNAHUMAS : Jurnal Kehumasan, 2, 388–402.

Oliver, K. (1999). Anchored Instruction. The SAGE Encyclopedia of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483346397.n20

Prayitno, S. H., & Alphareno, O. J. (2021). Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran Anchored Instruction dalam Pembelajaran Matematika Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(2), 1842–1853. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v5i2.565

Purnamasari, A., & Afriansyah, E. A. (2021). Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa SMP pada Topik Penyajian Data di Pondok Pesantren. Plusminus: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 1(2), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.31980/plusminus.v1i2.1257

Putra Imam Wijaya, H., Sujadi, I., Magister Pendidikan Matematika, P., & Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta, F. (2016). Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa Sesuai Dengan Gender Dalam Pemecahan Masalah Pada Materi Balok Dan Kubus (Studi Kasus Pada Siswa Smp Kelas Viii Smp Islam Al-Azhar 29 Semarang). Jurnal Elektronik Pembelajaran Matematika, 4(9), 778–788. http://jurnal.fkip.uns.ac.id

Putri, D. K., & Rochmad. (2021). Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa SMP Muhammadiyah Pangkalan Bun Ditinjau dari Kemandirian Belajar pada Pembelajaran Model Knisley. PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 4, 134–138.

Rachmawati, L. N., Cholily, Y. M., & Zukhrufurrohmah, Z. (2021). Mathematics Communication Mistakes in Solving Hots Problems. Infinity Journal, 10(1), 69. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v10i1.p69-80

Rohani, Ahmad, M., Lubis, I. S., & Nasution, D. P. (2022). KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KRITIS MATEMATIKA SISWA MELALUI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINK PAIR SHARE. AKSIOMA : Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 11(1), 504–518.

Ruggiero, V. R. (1998). The Art of Thinking: A Guide to Critical and Creative Thought (5th ed.).

Sachdeva, S., & Eggen, P.-O. (2021). Learners’ Critical Thinking About Learning Mathematics. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/11003

Saputra. (2012). Pengaruh Penggunaan Model Pembelajaran Anchored Intruction Terhadap Peningkatan Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis dan Self Concept Siswa. Disertasi Upi Bandung.

Saputra, E. (2017). Peningkatan Kemampuan Spasial Dan Komunikasi Matematis Pada Materi Geometri Dengan Menggunakan Model Anchored Instruction Ditinjau Dari Gaya Kognitif Siswa. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9).

Saputra, E., Ulya, K., Wahyuni, S., Rahmadhani, E., & Hakim, H. (2020). Media application in anchored instruction to support mathematics teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1460(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1460/1/012042

Sasindua, R., Rampe, M., & Karundeng, M. (2020). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Anchored Instruction terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa. Oxygenius Journal Of Chemistry Education, 2(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.37033/ojce.v2i1.141

Scriven, M., & Paul, R. (2011). Defining Critical Thinking. Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines, 26(1), 38–46. https://doi.org/10.5840/inquiryctnews20112616

Setyowati, A., & Subali, B. (2011). Implementasi Pendekatan Konflik Kognitif Dalam Pembelajaran Fisika Untuk Menumbuhkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Smp Kelas Viii. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 7(2), 89–96. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpfi.v7i2.1078

Shorten, A., & Smith, J. (2017). Mixed methods research: Expanding the evidence base. Evidence-Based Nursing, 20(3), 74–75. https://doi.org/10.1136/eb-2017-102699

Silverajah, V. S. G., & Govindaraj, A. (2018). The use of Edpuzzle to support low-achiever’s development of self-regulated learning and their learning of chemistry. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, October 2018, 259–263. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290511.3290582

Sirri, E. L., & Lestari, P. (2020). Implementasi Edpuzzle Berbantuan Whatsapp Group Sebagai Alternatif Pembelajaran Daring Pada Era Pandemi. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(2), 67–72.

Siswa, M. D. A. N. S., & Saputra, E. (2012). Sigma Didaktika,. 1, 10–19.

Smp, S., & Materi, P. (2018). Analisis kemampuan komunikasi matematis siswa smp pada materi statistika. 1(6), 1095–1104.

Sugianto, R., Cholily, Y. M., Darmayanti, R., Rahmah, K., Hasanah, N., & Malang, U. M. (2022). K r e a n o. 13(2), 221–233.

Sundi, V. H., Astari, T., Rosiyanti, H., & Ramadhani, A. (2020). Efektivitas Penggunaan Edpuzzle dalam Meningkatkan Motivasi Belajar pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Seminar Nasional Pengabdian Masyarakat LPPM UMJ, 1–10.

Wahyuni, V. (2022). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Talking Chip Terhadap Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis. LENTERNAL: Learning and Teaching Journal, 3(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.32923/lenternal.v3i1.2228

webster, M.-I. (1995). Webster’s New Encyclopedic Dictionary (BD&L (Firm) (ed.)). Black Dog & Leventhal Publishers.

Zaditania, A. P., & Ruli, R. M. (2022). Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa SMP dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Himpunan. Jurnal Educatio FKIP UNMA, 8(1), 328–336. https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v8i1.1997

Zetriuslita, Ariawan, R., & Nufus, H. (2016). ANALISIS KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KRITIS MATEMATIS MAHASISWA DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SOAL URAIAN KALKULUS INTEGRAL BERDASARKAN LEVEL KEMAMPUAN MAHASISWA. Infinity Journal Ilmiah Program Studi Matematika STKIP Siliwangi Bandung, 5(1), 56. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v5i1.p56-66

Zulhelmi, Adlim, & Mahidin. (2017). Pengaruh media pembelajaran interaktif terhadap peningkatan keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa [The effect of interactive learning media on improving students’ critical thinking skills]. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Science Education), 5(1), 72–80.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v14i2.16419

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

Creative Commons License
Al-Jabar : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.