PISA 2021 Creative Thinking Instrument for Students: Physics Teachers’ Perceptions


Nur Endah Susilowati, Muslim Muslim, Ridwan Efendi, Achmad Samsudin


Creative thinking, as one of the 21st century skills, is an ability that must be mastered by individuals, especially in this ever-changing era. Therefore, the demands of teachers are not only limited to training them in learning, but also knowing the profile of students’ creative thinking abilities is also considered very important. The purpose of this study was to describe teachers’ perceptions and interests about the need for creative thinking instruments with the PISA 2021 framework. A total of 30 physics teachers who teach in various provinces in Indonesia were involved as respondents in this study. Respondents are high school physics teachers with characteristics aged 20-40 years, 19 are female, and 11 are male. Based on the results of the analysis, it is known that more than 90% of respondents stated that it is very important to measure students’ creative thinking skills. As many as 83% of respondents stated that they were interested in the PISA 2021 creative thinking ability framework and wanted to try to do a creative thinking ability test with the PISA framework. Thus, teachers have a positive perception of the PISA 2021 creative thinking framework. For this reason, it is recommended for teachers to develop creative thinking instruments with the 2021 PISA framework to measure students' creative thinking skills in learning.


creative thinking skills, instrument, PISA 2021, teachers’ perception

Full Text:



G. A. Callanan, D. F. Perri, and S. M. Tomkowicz, “career management in uncertain times: challenges and opportunities,” Career Dev. Q., vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 353–365, 2017.

A. Craft, creativity and education futures: learning in a digital age. London: Trentham Books, 2010.

D. Geltner and R. D. Neufville, “Uncertainty, flexibility, valuation and design: How 21st century information and knowledge can improve 21st century urban development – part ii of ii,” Pacific Rim Prop. Res. J., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 251–276, 2012.

S. T. Akyıldız and V. Çelik, “Thinking outside the box: Turkish EFL teachers’ perceptions of creativity,” Think. Ski. Creat., vol. 36, no. January, 2020.

S. Davis, “Creativity and the cybernetics of self: drama, embodied creation and feedback processes,” in Creativity Theory and Action in Education, Switzerland: Springer, 2018.

OECD, “PISA 2021 creative thinking framework (third draft),” Oecd, vol. 53, no. 9, pp. 1689–1699, 2021.

B. Lucas and E. Spencer, Teaching creative thinking: developing learners who generate ideas and can think critically. United States of America: Crown House Publishing Limited, 2017.

A. A. S. Tabieh, M. M. Al-Hileh, H. M. J. Abu Afifa, and H. Y. Abuzagha, “The effect of using digital storytelling on developing active listening and creative thinking skills,” Eur. J. Educ. Res., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 13–21, 2020.

Q. Zhou, “Development of creative thinking skills through aesthetic creativity in middle school educational music course,” Think. Ski. Creat., vol. 40, 2021.

T. Hardianti and H. Kuswanto, “Difference among levels of inquiry : process skills improvement at senior high school in Indonesia,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 119–130, 2017.

F. Permata Sari, S. Nikmah, H. Kuswanto, and R. Wardani, “Development of physics comic based on local wisdom: Hopscotch (engklek) game android-assisted to improve mathematical representation ability and creative thinking of high school students,” Rev. Mex. Fis. E, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 255–262, 2020.

A. Saregar, S. Latifah, M. N. Hudha, F. Susanti, and N. E. Susilowati, “STEM-inquiry brainstorming: Critical and creative thinking skills in static fluid material,” Period. Tche Quim., vol. 17, no. 36, pp. 491–505, 2020.

K. C. Suryandari, S. Sajidan, S. B. Rahardjo, Z. K. Prasetyo, and S. Fatimah, “Project-based science learning and pre-service teachers’ science literacy and creative thinking,” Cakrawala Pendidik., vol. XXXVII, no. 3, pp. 345–355, 2018.

E. Istiyono, “Measuring creative thinking skills of senior high school male and female students in physics (CTSP) using the IRT-based PhysTCreTS,” J. Turkish Sci. Educ., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 578–590, 2020.

R. A. Beghetto, “Does creativity have a place in classroom discussions? Prospective teachers’ response preferences,” Think. Ski. Creat., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2007.

L. Tanggaard, “Stories about creative teaching and productive learning,” Eur. J. Teach. Educ., vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 219–232, 2011.

E. O. Bereczki and A. Kárpáti, “Teachers’ beliefs about creativity and its nurture: A systematic review of the recent research literature,” Educ. Res. Rev., vol. 23, no. October 2017, pp. 25–56, 2018.

J. Lee and H. Choi, “What affects learner’s higher-order thinking in technology-enhanced learning environments? The effects of learner factors,” Comput. Educ., vol. 115, pp. 143–152, 2017.

Z. Liu et al., “Neural and genetic determinants of creativity,” Neuroimage, vol. 174, pp. 164–176, 2018.

J. C. Kaufman and R. A. Beghetto, “Beyond big and little: The four C model of creativity,” Rev. Gen. Psychol., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2009.

S. M. Ritter et al., Assessing Creativity: A Guide for Educators, no. December. United States of America: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, 2002.

M. Sun, M. Wang, and R. Wegerif, “Effects of divergent thinking training on students’ scientific creativity: The impact of individual creative potential and domain knowledge,” Think. Ski. Creat., vol. 37, no. September 2019, pp. 1–10, 2020.

P. Gardiner, “Learning to think together: Creativity, interdisciplinary collaboration and epistemic control,” Think. Ski. Creat., vol. 38, no. December, 2020.

H. Caldwell, E. Whewell, and R. Heaton, “The impact of visual posts on creative thinking and knowledge building in an online community of educators,” Think. Ski. Creat., vol. 36, no. November 2019, p. 100647, 2020.

F. P. Sari, “Development of physics comic based on local wisdom: Hopscotch (engklek) game android-assisted to improve mathematical representation ability and creative thinking of high school students,” Rev. Mex. Fis. E, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 255–262, 2020.

E. S. Kurniawan, “Synectic HOTS oriented: Development of teaching materials for high school physics learning,” Univers. J. Educ. Res., vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 5547–5554, 2020.

I. Wicaksono, Wasis, and Madlazim, “The effectiveness of virtual science teaching model (VS-TM) to improve student’s scientific creativity and concept mastery on senior high school physics subject,” J. Balt. Sci. Educ., vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 549–561, 2017.

J. Batlolona, “Creative thinking skills students in physics on solid material elasticity,” J. Turkish Sci. Educ., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 48–61, 2019.

M. Aulia Rahman, Suparman, and Y. Hairun, “Design of teaching material for problem-based learning to improve creative thinking skills,” Univers. J. Educ. Res., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 559–565, 2020.

P. Yaniawati, R. Kariadinata, N. M. Sari, E. E. Pramiarsih, and M. Mariani, “Integration of e-learning for mathematics on resource-based learning: Increasing mathematical creative thinking and self-confidence,” Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn., vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 60–78, 2020.

Parno, E. Supriana, L. Yuliati, A. N. Widarti, M. Ali, and U. Azizah, “The influence of STEM-based 7E learning cycle on students critical and creative thinking skills in physics,” Int. J. Recent Technol. Eng., vol. 8, no. 2 Special Issue 9, pp. 761–769, 2019.

N. Wannapiroon and S. Petsangsri, “Effects of STEAMification model in flipped classroom learning environment on creative thinking and creative innovation,” TEM J., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 1647–1655, 2020.

G. Ozkan and U. Umdu Topsakal, “Exploring the effectiveness of STEAM design processes on middle school students’ creativity,” Int. J. Technol. Des. Educ., vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 95–116, 2021.

E. J. Park and M. J. Kim, “Visual communication for students’ creative thinking in the design studio: Translating filmic spaces into spatial design,” Buildings, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 1–19, 2021.

O. M. A. Aldalalah, “The Effectiveness of Infographic via Interactive Smart Board on enhancing Creative Thinking: A Cognitive Load Perspective,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 345–364, 2020.

S. Atun and V. P. S. Latupeirisa, “Science KIT teaching aid for the earthquake in improving students’ collaboration skills and creative thinking in junior high school,” Eur. J. Educ. Res., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 187–197, 2021.

N. Suyidno, Y. M., P. L., B. K., and B. Jatmiko, “Effectiveness of creative responsibility based teaching model on basic learning physics to increase student’s scientific creativity and responsibility,” J. Balt. Sci. Educ., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 136–151, 2017.

W. Wartono, M. Diantoro, and J. R. Bartlolona, “Influence of problem based learning learning model on student creative thinking on elasticity topics material,” J. Pendidik. Fis. Indones., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 32–39, 2018.

J. R. Batlolona, M. Diantoro, Wartono, and E. Latifah, “Creative thinking skills students in physics on solid material elasticity,” J. Turkish Sci. Educ., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 48–61, 2019.

M. Nuswowati and M. Taufiq, “Developing creative thinking skills and creative attitude through problem based green vision chemistry environment learning,” J. Pendidik. IPA Indones., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 170–176, 2015.

Shabrina and H. Kuswanto, “Android-assisted mobile physics learning through indonesian batik culture: Improving students’ creative thinking and problem solving,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 287–302, 2018.

K. M. Kim and R. Md-Ali, “Geogebra: Towards realizing 21st century learning in mathematics education,” Malaysian J. Learn. Instr., no. Specialissue, pp. 93–115, 2017.

M. B. Miles, A. M. Huberman, and J. Saldana, Qualitative data analysis a methods sourcebook, 3rd editio. Los Angeles: Sage, 2014.

A. Dedetürk, A. Kırmızıgül, and H. Kaya, “The effects of STEM activites on 6th grade studets’ conceptual development of sound,” J. Balt. Sci. Educ., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 21–37, 2021.

A. Dedetürk, A. S. Kırmızıgül, and H. Kaya, “The effects of stem activities on 6th grade students’ conceptual development of sound,” J. Balt. Sci. Educ., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 21–37, 2021.

J. J. Zhao and S. Y. Zhao, “Creativity and innovation programs offered by AACSB-accredited U.S. colleges of business: A Web mining study,” J. Educ. Bus., 2021.

J. Li, Z. Fu, Y. Gu, and Q. H. Qin, “Recent Advances and Emerging Applications of the Singular Boundary Method for Large-Scale and High-Frequency Computational Acoustics,” Adv. Appl. Math. Mech., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 315–343, 2022.

Z. Z.gagić, S. J. Skuban, B. N. Radulović, M. M. Stojanović, and O. Gajić, “The implementation of mind maps in teaching physics: Educational efficiency and students’ involvement,” J. Balt. Sci. Educ., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 117–131, 2019.

A. Sanchez-Gonzalez, J. Godwin, T. Pfaff, R. Ying, J. Leskovec, and P. W. Battaglia, “Learning to simulate complex physics with raph networks,” in Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 1–10, 2020.

S. M. Hosseini, M. Mohammadi, A. Rosemann, T. Schröder, and J. Lichtenberg, “A morphological approach for kinetic façade design process to improve visual and thermal comfort: Review,” Build. Environ., vol. 153, no. November 2018, pp. 186–204, 2019.

D. Henriksen, E. Creely, M. Henderson, and P. Mishra, “Creativity and technology in teaching and learning: a literature review of the uneasy space of implementation,” Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 2091–2108, 2021.

T. Shechter, S. Eden, and O. Spektor-Levy, “Preschoolers’ Nascent Engineering Thinking During a Construction Task,” J. Cogn. Educ. Psychol., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 83–111, 2021.

Y. Yang, Y. Long, D. Sun, J. Van Aalst, and S. Cheng, “Fostering students’ creativity via educational robotics: An investigation of teachers’ pedagogical practices based on teacher interviews,” Br. J. Educ. Technol., vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 1826–1842, 2020.

S. Ndiung, Sariyasa, E. Jehadus, and R. A. Apsari, “The effect of treffinger creative learning model with the use rme principles on creative thinking skill and mathematics learning outcome,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 873–888, 2021.

S. Maksić and S. Jošić, “Scaffolding the development of creativity from the students’ perspective,” Think. Ski. Creat., vol. 41, 2021.

A. J. Khoiriyah and H. Husamah, “Problem-based Learning: Creative Thinking Skills, Problem-solving Skills, and Learning Outcome of Seventh Grade Students,” J. Pendidik. Biol. Indones., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 151–160, 2018.

S. Rahimi and V. J. Shute, “First inspire, then instruct to improve students’ creativity,” Comput. Educ., vol. 174, 2021.

K. Biswas, P. Rajput, A. Gupta, B. Bhattacharya, and T. Gupta, “A User-Centric Design Thinking Approach for Advancement in Off-Line PM Air Samplers: Current Status and Future Directions,” Aerosol Sci. Eng., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 239–259, 2020.

S. Kim, I. Choe, and J. C. Kaufman, “The development and evaluation of the effect of creative problem-solving program on young children’s creativity and character,” Think. Ski. Creat., vol. 33, no. September, pp. 1–11, 2019.

K. Ulger, “The effect of problem-based learning on the creative thinking and critical thinking disposition of students in visual arts education,” Interdiscip. J. Probl. Learn., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–21, 2018.

A. A. Kholmurzaev and I. K. Tokhirov, “The active participation of students in the formation of the educational process is a key to efficiency,” Acad. An Int. Multidiscip. Res. J., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 435–439, 2021.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24042/ijsme.v5i2.12439

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 872 | PDF downloads : 344


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2022 Unit Riset dan Publikasi Ilmiah FTK UIN Raden Intan Lampung

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License

Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License