Effect of self and peer assessments on mathematics learning achievement


Baiduri Baiduri


Assessment is an essential part of the learning process in higher education. As a result, the assessment should involve students in addition to lecturers. The purpose of this study is to examine the self and peer assessments on the answers to midterm and final-semester exams given by lecturers and their relationship with student achievement. The participants in this study were 114 fifth-semester mathematics education students who took differential equations courses. Data were gathered from student assessment scores on the middle and final test and student achievement in the lecturer's differential equations courses. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and an independent sample t-test to describe the self and peer assessments. Pearson correlation analysis was also used to describe the relationship between self and peer assessment and learning achievement. The study revealed no significant difference between self and peer assessments, both midterm and final semester assessments. The midterm assessment said that the average self-assessment was higher than peers. Meanwhile, the assessment average scores obtained in the semester's final exam were nearly identical between the two assessors. There is a positive and significant correlation with a high level of self and peer assessments, both in the midterm and final semester, and a positive and significant correlation with a moderate level of self and peer assessments with learning achievement. These findings can be used as a basis for lecturers to consider when involving students in assessing student achievement.


Self-assessment; Peer assessment; Learning achievement.

Full Text:



Abrache, M.-A., Bendou, A., & Cherkaoui, C. (2021). Clustering and combinatorial optimization based approach for learner matching in the context of peer assessment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(6), 1135–1168.

Al-Abdullatif, A. M. (2020). Alternative assessment approaches and quality product design within web-based learning environments. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies, 15(3), 60–74.

Alias, M., Masek, A., & Salleh, H. H. M. (2015). Self, peer and teacher assessments in problem based learning: Are they in agreements?. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 204, 309–317.

Birjandi, P., & Tamjid, T. N. (2012). The role of self-, peer and teacher assessment in promoting Iranian EFL learners’ writing performance. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(5), 513–533.

Brignell, C., Wicks, T., Tomas, C., & Halls, J. (2019). The impact of peer assessment on mathematics students’ understanding of marking criteria and their ability to self-regulate learning. MSOR Connections, 18(1), 46–55.

Burkhardt, H., & Swan, M. (2012). Designing assessment of performance in mathematics. Educational Designer, 2(5), 1–40.

Chang, C. C., Tseng, K. H., & Lou, S. J. (2012). A comparative analysis of the consistency and difference among teacher-assessment, student self-assessment and peer-assessment in a web-based portfolio assessment environment for high school students. Computers and Education, 58(1), 303–320.

Chang, S.-C., Hsu, T.-C., & Jong, M. S.-Y. (2020). Integration of the peer assessment approach with a virtual reality design system for learning earth science. Computers and Education, 146, 103758, 1–32.

Chen, I.-C., Hwang, G.-J., Lai, C.-L., & Wang, W.-C. (2020). From design to reflection: Effects of peer-scoring and comments on students’ behavioral patterns and learning outcomes in musical theater performance. Computers and Education, 150, 103856, 1–21.

Double, K. S., McGrane, J. A., & Hopfenbeck, T. N. (2020). The impact of peer assessment on academic performance: A meta-analysis of control group studies. Educational Psychology Review, 32(2), 481–509.

Golightly, A. (2021). Self and peer assessment of preservice geography teachers' contribution in problem-based learning activities in geography education. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 30(1), 75–90.

Goss-Sampson., M. A. (2020). Statistical analysis in Jasp: A guide for students. 4th edition Jasp v 0.14.

Hassell, D., & Lee, K. Y. (2019). Evaluation of self and peer assessments in a second year engineering module. IAFOR Journal of Education, 7(2), 107–130.

Hodgson, P., Chan, K., & Liu, J. (2014). Outcomes of synergetic peer assessment: First-year experience. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(2), 168–178.

Iglesias Pérez, M. C., Vidal-Puga, J., & Pino Juste, M. R. (2020). The role of self and peer assessment in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 47(3), 1–10.

Iraji, H. R., Enayat, M. J., & Momeni, M. (2016). The effects of self- and peer-assessment on Iranian EFL learners' argumentative writing performance. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6(4), 716–722.

Jones, I., & Alcock, L. (2014). Peer assessment without assessment criteria. Studies in Higher Education, 39(10), 1774–1787.

Khonbi, Z. A., & Sadeghi, K. (2012). The effect of assessment type (self vs. peer vs. teacher) on Iranian University EFL students’ course achievement. Language Testing in Asia, 2(4), 47–74.

Khonbi, Z. A., & Sadeghi, K. (2013). Self-, peer-, and teacher-assessment: An investigation into Iranian EFL students’ attitudes. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 3(1), 87–107.

Kilic, D. (2016). An examination of using self-, peer-, and teacher-assessment in higher education: A case study in teacher education. Higher Education Studies, 6(1), 136–144.

Lindblom-Ylänne, S., Pihlajamäki, H., & Kotkas, T. (2006). Self-, peer- and teacher-assessment of student essays. Active Learning in Higher Education, 7(1), 51–62.

Meihami, H., & Esfandiari, R. (2020). Comparative effects of self-assessment, peer-assessment, and teacher assessment on efl learners’ writing performance. XLinguae, 13(4), 91–107.

Nawas, A. (2020). Grading anxiety with self and peer-assessment: A mixed-method study in an indonesian efl context. Issues in Educational Research, 30(1), 224–244.

Ndoye, A. (2017). Peer/self assessment and student learning. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 29(2), 255–269.

Omar, S. N. P. (2018). The use of peer assessment to improve students’ learning of geometry. European Journal of Social Science Education and Research, 5(2), 187-206.

Oren, F. S. (2018). Self, peer and teacher assessments: What is the level of relationship between them?. European Journal of Education Studies, 4(7), 1–19.

Sharma, R., Jain, A., Gupta, N., Garg, S., Batta, M., & Dhir, S. (2016). Impact of self-assessment by students on their learning. International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research, 6(3), 226-229.

Stančić, M. (2020). Peer assessment as a learning and self-assessment tool: A look inside the black box. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(6), 852-864.

Vasileiadou, D., & Karadimitriou, K. (2021). Examining the impact of self-assessment with the use of rubrics on primary school students’ performance. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 2(2021), 1–9.

Zakian, M., Moradan, A., & Naghibi, S. E. (2012). The relationship between self-, peer-, and teacher-assessments of EFL learners’ speaking. World J Arts, Languages, and Social Sciences, 1(1), 1–5.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v13i1.10731

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 511 | PDF downloads : 153


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2022 Al-Jabar : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


Creative Commons License
Al-Jabar : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.